Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Millennial-scale variability of East Asian summer monsoon inferred from sea surface salinity in the northern East China Sea (ECS) and its impact on the Japan Sea during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 5
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science20196:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0283-0

  • Received: 2 August 2018
  • Accepted: 18 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Color alternations in deep-sea sediment in the Japan Sea have been thought to be linked to millennial-scale variations in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM), associated with the Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) cycles and Heinrich events in the high-latitude North Atlantic during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3). In this study, we investigate the variability of sea surface salinity (SSS) in the northern East China Sea (ECS) to evaluate the EASM precipitation in South China and its linkage to the sediment color of the Japan Sea during MIS 3. High time resolution (< 100 years) SSS along with sea surface temperature (SST) records were reconstructed using paired Mg/Ca and the oxygen isotope of planktic foraminifera Globigerionoides ruber sensu stricto from core KR07-12 PC-01 recovered from the northern ECS. The results indicate that millennial-scale variability of the SSS is observed with the amplitude of ~ ± 1 during MIS 3. The variations in SSS are well correlated to D-O cycles and Heinrichs. The EASM precipitation decreases in association with the southward shift of the westerly jet in D-O stadials and Heinrichs, suggesting suppressed moisture convergence along the EASM front associated with weakened North Pacific subtropical high in response to the slow-down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. In a comparison between the SSS in the ECS and the color alternation in the Japan Sea, closely correlated variations between the two records in the interval 44–34 ka indicate that the SSS in the ECS plays a crucial role in regulating nutrient and salinity inflow into the Japan Sea. However, the linkage becomes ambiguous, especially after ~ 30 ka, when the sea level falls toward the level of the last glacial maximum. This shift is associated with changes in sediment facies, confirming that the underlying mechanism in regulating the sedimentary change in the Japan Sea depends on the sea level.

Graphical Abstract image

Keywords

  • East Asian summer monsoon
  • Salinity
  • East China Sea
  • MIS 3
  • Mg/Ca-derived SST
  • D-O cycles

Background

Since high-resolution, continuous oxygen isotope (δ18O) records of the Greenland ice cores covering the past > 100 ka have demonstrated millennial-scale climate changes during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3 (59–29 ka), the so-called Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) cycle. The D-O cycle attracted considerable attention due to its abruptness, large amplitude, high frequency, and potential impact on global climate (e.g., Dansgaard et al. 1993). In the Asian monsoon region, the Quaternary hemipelagic sediments of the Japan Sea are characterized by centimeter- to decimeter-scale alternation of dark and light clay to silty clay, which are bio-siliceous and/or bio-calcareous to a various degree (Tada et al. 1999; Tada et al. 2018; Irino et al. 2018). Tada et al. (1999) demonstrated the occurrence of the basin-wide dark-light color alternations in the sediments of the Japan Sea, which are well correlated with D-O cycles. They hypothesized that these sediment color alternations could be attributed to changes in the nutrient and freshwater influx through the Tsushima Strait due to changes in the Changjiang (Yangtze) River discharge (i.e., summer precipitation in South China). Namely, increased summer precipitation in the Changjiang Basin caused the expansion of the low-salinity and nutrient-enriched coastal waters in the northern part of the East China Sea (ECS) during the interstadials of the D-O cycle, which flowed into the Japan Sea and resulted in the accumulation of organic carbon-rich dark layers (Tada et al. 1999).

Summer precipitation in East Asia is known as Meiyu (China), Baiu (Japan), and Changma (Korea), and is one of the crucial aspects of the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM) system. A series of high-resolution speleothem δ18O (δ18Osp) records in southeastern and central China, which had been interpreted as reflecting EASM intensity/precipitation, demonstrated millennial-scale variations in association with D-O cycles (Wang et al. 2001; Cheng et al. 2016). However, the interpretation of the δ18Osp is controversial as studies using analyses of δ18O mass balance and climate models suggested that the δ18Osp record reflects neither local precipitation nor EASM circulation intensity, but rather changes in the moisture source or seasonality of the precipitation (Clemens et al. 2010; Dayem et al. 2010; Pausata et al. 2011; Maher and Thompson 2012). More recently, a trace element study on one of the Chinese speleothems has claimed that millennial-scale δ18Osp variations during the last deglaciation were better interpreted as changes in the EASM circulation, instead of the local precipitation (Zhang et al. 2018). By contrast, a proxy of sea surface salinity (SSS) from a marine core provides reliable information on the changes in regional precipitation, through a freshwater inflow from rivers, which can further serve to test the hypothesis by Tada et al. (1999).

The northern ECS is a crucial area, vis-à-vis its position where the freshwater from the Changjiang (Yangtze) River reaches it and the waters from the ECS inflow to the Japan Sea (Fig. 1). Ijiri et al. (2005) reported millennial-scale light δ18O peaks of planktic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber sensu stricto (δ18Op) in the northern ECS during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3 and stated that these peaks might capture larger freshwater discharge events associated with D-O interstadials. However, their age model did not allow for determination of these timings precisely enough compared to other records, and the effect of temperature changes on foraminiferal δ18O was not adequately evaluated because they used an alkenone temperature proxy, which may have been recording sea surface temperature (SST) during a different season and at different depth from those of G. ruber s.s. (Kim et al. 2015).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a Locality map showing site of KR07-12 PC-01 and reference sites. b Site location in the ECS during MIS 3 and the shore area (shaded area) at − 80 m sea level during MIS 3. c SST (Locarnini et al. 2010) and d SSS in July (Antonov et al. 2010) in the ECS

Thus, in this study, we reconstructed the local δ18O of seawater (δ18Ow-local), an indicator of SSS, and SST in the northern ECS during MIS 3 using paired δ18Op and Mg/Ca of G. ruber s.s., and estimated variability of SSS to test the presence of millennial-scale EASM precipitation oscillations in South China associated with D-O cycles. We used a marine core KR07-12 PC-01 recovered from the northern ECS that covers the time interval since 44 ka, thus covering the late half of MIS 3.

The ECS is a marginal sea in the northwestern Pacific Ocean, and the East Asian monsoons control its seasonal ocean current system (e.g., Ichikawa and Beardsley 2002). The SSS in the ECS changes drastically throughout a year, particularly in the northern part, due to the considerable influence of river discharge caused by the EASM precipitation (Ichikawa and Beardsley 2002). The Changjiang River is the most significant contributor of freshwater to the ECS, accounting for ~ 90% of the total freshwater supplied to the ECS from rivers, and its discharge is characterized by a remarkable seasonal cycle with its zenith in July and nadir in January (Chen et al. 1994; Isobe et al. 2002). Accordingly, the SSS in the northern ECS decreases in summer and increases in winter (Ichikawa and Beardsley 2002). Changjiang Diluted Water (CDW) is formed by Changjiang freshwater mixing with the ambient seawater around the estuary, which then flows eastward into the Japan Sea during the summer (e.g., Ichikawa and Beardsley 2002; Isobe et al. 2002).

Based on instrumental observations, the maximum SST near the studied site is 28.4 °C in August, and the minimum is 17.7 °C in February (Japan Oceanographic Data Center 2004). In contrast, SSS reaches a maximum of 34.7 in February and decreases to a minimum of 33.0 in July, when the maximum discharge from the Changjiang River occurs. The spatial patterns of SST and SSS during summer are characterized by lower SST and SSS in the northwest and higher SST and SSS in the southeast part of the northern ECS (Fig. 1). The lower SSS during the summer suggests that river discharge due to the EASM dominates the seasonal changes in the Kuroshio (Sun et al. 2005); otherwise, the strengthened Kuroshio results in increased SSS during summer, when its volume transport is the largest (Ichikawa and Beardsley 1993; Andres et al. 2008). It was demonstrated that the CDW reaches the easternmost part of the northern ECS across the shelf break during summer, based on 226Ra and 228Ra measurements of surface waters (Inoue et al. 2012). Inoue et al. (2012) calculated the relative contribution of the Changjiang freshwater in this area as approximately 2–3% in July and October, based on mass balance calculation of the SSS and 228Ra concentration of surface water samples collected between 2008 and 2010. Instrumental SSS data around the core site shows a negative correlation with the Changjiang River discharge during the wet season for the past 50 years (Kubota et al. 2015), confirming that the studied site is an appropriate location to reconstruct SSS.

Methods/Experimental

The piston core KR07-12 PC-01 (31° 40.63′ N, 129° 01.98′ E, 736 m water depth) was composed of olive-black or olive-gray, homogenous, well-bioturbated clay. Scattered shell fragments and mottled textures caused by burrows were occasionally identified (Fig. 2). Ash layers were identified at depth intervals of 98.0–118.0 cm and 947.5–990.3 cm, which correspond to the K-Ah and Aira (AT) tephras, respectively, based on the morphology and refractive index of glass shards in each tephra, and heavy mineral assemblages (Table 1). An ash pocket was found at 170.0–172.0 cm, identified as Sz-S (Table 1). The refractive index of each volcanic glass shard was measured using the RIMS-2002 analyzer (Danhara et al. 1992) at Kyoto Fission Track Co. Ltd. The other ashes found at 75.0–84.0 cm and 188.0–190.0 cm are unknown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Age-depth relationship of core KR07-12 PC-01 together with 2σ age uncertainties and columnar section. The black circles and lines represent 14C-based datum and its age model. The red line indicates the fine-tuned age model. The blue crosses represent the tie points in the fine-tuned age model

Table 1

Results of tephra analyses

Sample ID

Sub-bottom depth (cm)

Glass type

Heavy minerals

Glass morphology

Refractive Index of glass shard

Correlation

Maximum

Minimum

Mean

Mode

KRP10650

98–118

bw > > pm

Opx, Opq, Cpx

H > T, C

1.5102

1.5198

1.5123

1.511

K-Ah

KRP10711

170–172

pm

Opx, Cpx, Opq (Ap, GHb)

T, C, H

1.5067

1.5102

1.509

1.509

S-Sz

KRP11507

947.5–990.3

bw > > pm

Opx, GHb, Ap, Cpx, Bt

H > T, C

1.4982

1.5011

1.5001

1.5

AT

Glass type: bw bubble-wall type, pm pumice type. Heavy minerals: Opx orthopyroxene, Cpx clinopyroxene, GHb green hornblende, Opq opaque minerals, Bt biotite, At apatite. Glass morphology (after Yoshikawa 1976): H large broken bubble-wall type, T fibrous and pumice type, C intermediate type

Approximately 10 cm3 of bulk sediment samples was subsampled at 2.5 cm intervals and washed using a 63 μm mesh to concentrate foraminiferal tests for 14C dating, δ18Op, and Mg/Ca measurements. For 14C dating, approximately 3–5 mg of the planktic foraminifera Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, from the size fraction > 250 μm, was collected from 15 horizons (Table 2). All of the 14C data were acquired at the NIES-TERRA AMS facility, National Institute for Environmental Studies (Tanaka et al. 2000; Yoneda et al. 2004; Uchida et al. 2004). We analyzed 244 samples in total for paired δ18Op and Mg/Ca. The time resolution of the analyses was ~ 80 years for MIS 3, ~ 130 years for early MIS 2 and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), and > 300 years for the last deglaciation. For δ18Op and trace element analyses, approximately 30–40 individual G. ruber s.s. was picked from 250 to 355 μm size fractions and crushed to homogenize. After being cleaned by milli-Q water and methanol, approximately 50–70 μg of foraminiferal tests was separated and used for the oxygen isotope analysis. The δ18Op was measured by two Finnigan MAT 252 Stable Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometers with a Keil III carbonate device installed at the Mutsu Institute for Oceanography in the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology and at the University of Tokyo. The reproducibility of the measurement was better than ± 0.05‰ (1σ) for δ18Op, as determined by replicate measurements of international standards NBS-19 (RM8544 Limestone) and JCp-1 (Coral Porites sp.), provided by the Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ/AIST).
Table 2

Results of AMS radiocarbon and calendar ages

Depth (cm)

14C age (year BP)

14C age error

2σ calibrated calendar ages (year BP)

20–25

2283

33

1815–2215

78–80.5

5790

42

6125–6479

180.5–183

11,769

48

13,159–13,489

280.5–285.5

14,373

55

16,764–17,414

381–386

15,566

59

18,307–18,733

481.5–486.5

17,323

75

20,210–20,808

581.3–586.3

18,581

78

21,865–22,389

682.3–687.3

20,114

88

23,525–24,134

785–787.5

22,039

103

25,746–26,202

885–887.5

24,175

98

27,637–28,125

1083.3–1085.8

29,033

132

32,265–33,404

1184.1–1186.6

31,295

152

34,538–35,259

1283.6–1286.1

33,168

166

36,311–37,596

1384.6–1389.6

35,930

204

39,677–40,813

1484.1–1486.6

39,650

408

42,479–43,851

Additional cleaning steps were performed for trace element analyses. The samples were cleaned using the reductive method, including reductive and oxidative cleaning steps published by Boyle and Keigwin (1985), with a slight modification (Kubota et al. 2010). Mg/Ca analysis was performed using a Thermo Finnigan ELEMENT 2 High-Resolution Multi-Sector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (HR-ICP-MS) at the Mutsu Institute for Oceanography in the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. Isotopes of four elements (24Mg, 44Ca, 48Ca, and 55Mn) were analyzed using Sc as an internal standard (Uchida et al. 2008). Four working standards were prepared by successive dilutions of the stock standard solutions to match the concentrations of Ca (approximately 100 ppb, 500 ppb, 2 ppm, and 5 ppm) and Mg (0.05 ppb, 0.2 ppb, 1.0 ppb, and 5 ppb), respectively, which covered the Ca and Mg concentration ranges of all samples (Kubota et al. 2010, 2015). The precision of the replicate analysis of the working standard for Mg/Ca was better than ± 0.09 mmol/mol, corresponding to ± 0.3 °C in temperature scale. Mn/Ca was analyzed to monitor Mn-Fe oxide contamination. Mn/Ca was under 200 μmol/mol in most of the samples (Additional file 1: Figure S1), but exceeded 400 μmol/mol in 5 samples. However, these values are not excluded because there is no correlation between Mg/Ca and Mn/Ca (Additional file 1: Figure S1). In order to examine the homogeneity of the sample, G. ruber s.s. were repicked from 66 randomly selected horizons of core KR07-12 PC-01 and run for Mg/Ca analyses with the same cleaning protocol. The reanalyzed Mg/Ca value at 1392.1–1389.6 cm was 5.0 °C lower than the first one and was discarded. An average of the differences in Mg/Ca values of the replicate analyses for the rest of 65 horizons was 0.16 mmol/mol (~ 0.7 °C). Compared with the Mg/Ca values of U1429 for the same period in the previous study (Clemens et al. 2018), an average of KR07-12 PC-01 was slightly lower by 0.157 mmol/mol than those of U1429. Since the Mg/Ca values of U1429 were confirmed by an international CaCO3 reference standard, coral Porites standard material JCp-1 (4.199 ± 0.065 mmol/mol, Hathorne et al. 2013), we added 0.157 mmol/mol (~ 0.6 °C) to the original Mg/Ca values of KR07-12 PC-01 to adjust to the value of the U1429.

Although Mg/Ca of foraminiferal calcite is primarily controlled by temperature, a secondary effect of the salinity has been pointed out; Mg/Ca increases when salinity increases (e.g., Lea et al. 1999). In this study, in order to examine the salinity effect on the results to better estimate the SSS variability in the northern ECS, we tested three calibration methods to obtain SST and δ18Ow-local as follows: (1) a conventional Mg/Ca calibration without salinity correction (referred to “no salinity correction”), (2) an Mg/Ca calibration with salinity correction (“salinity correction”), (3) an Mg/Ca calibration with salinity correction in addition to incorporating the effect of changes in endmember δ18Ow (“endmember correction”). The SSS is reconstructed in the methods of “salinity correction” and “endmember correction.” Here, we refer to “endmember” as physical values such as SSS and δ18Ow in the source regions. The purpose of the “endmember correction” is to examine whether or not changes in the δ18Ow in the source region account for changes in the δ18Ow in the northern ECS. The results are compared in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Comparison among the results with three different calibrations for KR07-12 PC-01: “No salinity correction” (gray), “salinity correction” (red), and “endmember correction” (blue). a δ18O of planktic foraminifer (δ18Op). b SST. c δ18Ow-local. d SST vs. δ18Ow-local derived from “no salinity correction” calibration method. e SST vs. δ18Ow-local derived from “salinity correction” calibration method

First, for the “no salinity correction” calculation, we used an Mg/Ca calibration (Eq. 1) by Dekens et al. (2002), without correction for sediment water depth, and Bemis et al.’s (1998) δ18O–temperature relationship (low light) (Eq. 2). The δ18Ow-local was obtained after removing the global sea level effect from total δ18Ow using Waelbroeck et al.’s (2002) curve (Eq. 3; Thirumalai et al. 2016).
$$ \mathrm{Mg}/\mathrm{Ca}=\exp\ \left(0.09\times T\right)/0.38 $$
(1)
$$ T=16.5-4.8\times \left({\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{p}}-{\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{w}}+0.27\right) $$
(2)
$$ {\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{w}}={\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{w}-\mathrm{local}}-0.008\times \mathrm{sea}\ \mathrm{level} $$
(3)
Here, T, δ18Op, and δ18Ow denote temperature, δ18O of planktic foraminiferal calcite, and δ18O of water. δ18Ow in Eq. 3 includes local and global (sea level) components. Second, for the “salinity correction” calculation, we used an Mg/Ca calibration with salinity correction (Eq. 4; Tierney et al. 2015) instead of Eq. 1. The SST and δ18Ow-local were derived using a MATLAB script, Paleo-Seawater Uncertainty Solver (PSU Solver) (Thirumalai et al. 2016) with the methodology of Clemens et al. (2018) as explained below. As no regional Mg/Ca calibration exists for the ECS, we employed the Mg/Ca calibration of Tierney et al. (2015) that utilized all available culture data in a multivariate calibration that accounts for both salinity and temperature. We utilized the δ18O-temperature relationship of Eq. 2 and the ECS seawater δ18Ow-local-salinity relationship of Horikawa et al. (2015) (Eq. 5), as well as the global sea-level curve of Waelbroeck et al. (2002) (Eq. 3).
$$ \mathrm{Mg}/\mathrm{Ca}=\exp\ \left(0.084\times T+0.051\times S-2.54\right) $$
(4)
$$ {\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{w}-\mathrm{local}}=0.23\times S-7.74 $$
(5)

Here, S represents salinity.

Third, for the “endmember correction” calculation, we replaced Eq. 5 to 6 (LeGrande and Schmidt 2011). This model (Eq. 6) allows slope (a) and intercept (b) to vary through time so that the effect of temporal changes in endmembers is captured. The following two steps were conducted to obtain “a” and “b” in Eq. 6: step 1—estimate of the freshwater δ18O to obtain intercept “b,” step 2—estimate of the Kuroshio water δ18O and salinity to obtain slope “a.” Eventually, errors are given based on the Monte Carlo simulation, as will be explained later in this section. Before the calculation, each data set was linearly interpolated (100-year step).
$$ {\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{w}}=a\times S+b $$
(6)
In step 1, we regard the freshwater δ18O of the Changjiang River as intercept “b” (Kubota et al. 2015). Following Kubota et al. (2015), we utilized a composite record of Cheng et al.’s (2016) δ18Osp to estimate the freshwater δ18Ow (Kubota et al. 2015), on the assumption that the temporal variations in δ18Osp reflect the drip water δ18O in the caves, hence, the river water δ18O. We used the total δ18Ow, which includes local and global components, in Eq. 6 instead of δ18Ow-local to avoid correcting a global component for δ18Osp. Here, we define that the variability in intercept “b” is equal to that in δ18Osp (Eq. 7). Both sides of Eq. 7 represent subtracting a modern value from values at a given time in the past. We employed − 7.74‰, which is derived from Eq. 5 (Horikawa et al. 2015), as the modern intercept (left side of Eq. 7). For the modern δ18Osp value (right side of Eq. 7), an average for the last 1 ka of the Chinese speleothem record (Cheng et al. 2016) was employed. The time series of the endmember δ18Ow is shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2. The adequacy of these parameters will be discussed in the “Results and Discussion” section.
$$ b-\left(-7.74\right)={\updelta}^{18}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{sp}}-\left(-9.0\right) $$
(7)

In step 2, we obtained another set of δ18Ow and S as input data in Eq. 6 to determine slope “a” using a high-time resolution paired Mg/Ca and δ18Op data of G. ruber from core MD06-3067 (6° 31′ N, 126° 30′ E, 1575 m water depth) in the western tropical Pacific (Additional file 2: Figure S2; Bolliet et al. 2011). We regard this site as a reference location for the endmember of the Kuroshio water, since the site of core MD06-3067 is affected by the Mindanao Current that shares the same origin of waters, North Equatorial Current, with the Kuroshio. A strong upwelling affects intermediate and subsurface waters in this region, but the upwelled water does not reach the surface upper 75 m (Udarbe-Walker and Villanoy 2001) where G. ruber dwells. Therefore, it is inferred that surface water in this region still holds the origin’s water properties. In fact, the SSS at nearby site MD06-3067 in the western tropical Pacific is 34.0–34.3 during July to September (World Ocean Atlas 2009; Antonov et al. 2010), which is similar to the SSS in the Kuroshio region in the ECS. Although low-resolution Mg/Ca and δ18O data exists in the north of the bifurcation latitude (~ 14° N) of the Kuroshio at Benham Rise (MD06-3047B; Jia et al. 2018), the site MD06-3067 is a better site in terms of the time resolution, as a major process of this “endmember correction” is to evaluate the influence of the millennial-scale variability in the source region. The δ18Ow and SSS of core MD06–3067 are derived from PSU Solver with Eqs. 24 and δ18Ow-salinity equation for Palau (Conroy et al. 2017).

In the final step, Eqs. 24, 6, and 7 were solved with the input data derived from steps 1 and 2. We performed the Monte Carlo simulation to constrain errors associated with the age uncertainty among the records and temperature, salinity, and δ18Ow reconstructions propagated from analytical errors for measurements of Mg/Ca and δ18Op. In the Monte Carlo simulation, temperature, salinity, and δ18Ow at a given time “t” were calculated with randomly selected input data (Mg/Ca and δ18Op of KR07-12 PC-01, δ18Osp, and δ18Ow and salinity of MD06-3067) in the range of t – 0.5 ka < t < t + 0.5 ka. The analytical error was prescribed to the Mg/Ca and δ18Op data, incorporated as a normal distribution (Thirumalai et al. 2016). We set 0.16 mmol/mol and 0.05‰ for the Mg/Ca and δ18O uncertainties, respectively. Median value and standard deviation (1σ) are yielded at each time step after 500 repetitions of the simulation (Fig. 3). All of the calculations were performed on MATLAB.

Results and Discussion

Age model

Conventional 14C ages were calibrated to calendar ages using CALIB 7.1 (Stuiver et al. 2016) with Marine13 (Reimer et al. 2013). For the local reservoir correction (ΔR), − 93 ± 69 years, a weighted mean of the 10 nearest locations to the core site (available at http://calib.org/marine/) was applied. Constant linear sedimentation rates were assumed between two adjacent 14C-based age-controlling points (listed in Table 2) when constructing the age model (Fig. 2). In addition to the 14C-based datums, published calendar ages of the K-Ah (7.165–7.303 ka) and AT (30.009 ± 0.189 ka) tephras, dated on Lake Suigetsu sediments in SG06 core (Smith et al. 2013), were used as the age datums. In this age model, instantaneous sedimentation was assumed between the top and bottom of the two thick ash layers (K-Ah 98.0–118.0 cm, AT 947.5–990.3 cm). A published 14C age of S-Sz is 11.295 ± 0.30 ka derived from soil materials below the tephra layer (Okuno et al. 1997), which was calibrated to a calendar age of 12.631–13.768 ka (2σ) in this study using CALIB 7.1 (Stuiver et al. 2016) with IntCal13 (Reimer et al. 2013). We did not apply the recalibrated age of S-Sz in our model since its uncertainty is large. The S-Sz age with our age model, which is 12.4 ka, is younger than the 2σ probability range of the soil samples, probably because the soil materials were sampled below the tephra layer (Okuno et al. 1997).

The age model was further fine-tuned to a composite record of the Chinese δ18Osp (Additional file 3: Figure S3 and Additional file 4: Table S1), assuming an in-phase relationship between the climate in the northern ECS and hydroclimate variability over China as mentioned in Clemens et al. (2018). This assumption is justified in the following discussion by correlating the AT tephra layer in our core and its age with others. AT tephra is most precisely dated using the Suigetsu Lake sediment, whose microfossil 14C ages are generally consistent with the IntCal13 curve for a 31–29 ka interval (Reimer et al. 2013). Although the speleothem 14C data from Hulu Cave, China, was available back to 27 ka in 2013, a recently published 14C data set from the same cave confirmed the consistency with IntCal13 between 10 and 33 ka within the uncertainty range of less than ± 0.5 ka (Cheng et al. 2018 and included figures). Correlating the AT tephra with the speleothem record is possible through IntCal13 without consideration of the marine reservoir, since the ages of our core around 30 ka rely on the age determined by the Suigetsu Lake sediment. We expect that the age uncertainty range of this correlation is probably less than 0.5 ka. Compared with the time series of δ18Osp, a positive peak in δ18Op in KR07-12 PC-01 at 30 ka is highly likely correlated to a positive peak in δ18Osp. This agreement allows us to conclude that this assumption is plausible and further infer that in-phase correlation is highly likely for other climatic events during MIS 3. An out-of-phase relationship is especially unlikely, as the time offset between negative and positive peaks is beyond the age uncertainty.

The age-depth curve of the fine-tuned age model was compared with the age model based only on 14C datums in Additional file 3: Figure S3. The fine-tuned age model did not contradict the 14C-based ages as the obtained ages with the fine-tuned age model at the horizons of the 14C datums were within the 2σ uncertainties (Fig. 2 and Additional file 3: Figure S3). The average linear sedimentation rates were approximately 40 cm/ka during MIS 3 and 15 cm/ka during the Holocene. The highest one (~ 50 cm/ka) was found at LGM to deglaciation. Our sampling interval is frequent enough to satisfy the required Nyquist frequency (1/500 year−1 in this case), which is 1/2 of the expected frequency to obtain accurate peaks in a time series data. The time resolution of the 14C-based datums is 3–4 ka as listed in Table 2. We assume that the age uncertainty of the sampling horizons between the datums is similar to those at the datums based on the linear age-depth relationship in our age model (Fig. 2).

Salinity effect on Mg/Ca calibration

This section discusses the results derived from “no salinity correction” and “salinity correction.” The temporal patterns of the variations in SST and δ18Ow-local with the two calibrations agree well. However, the result with salinity correction for KR07-12 PC-01 shows less amplitude than that without salinity correction for both SST and δ18Ow-local (Fig. 3), indicating that salinity effect on Mg/Ca amplifies the variability of SST. This is indicative in Fig. 3, showing that the positive correlation between SST and δ18Ow-local is stronger in “no salinity correction” than in one with salinity correction for MIS 3. Furthermore, these relationships depend on the sea level for the case without salinity correction, and the positive correlation becomes stronger as the sea level lowers (Fig. 3d, e). Given that the river mouth of the Changjiang River approaches as the sea level lowers, the sea-level dependence of the SST-δ18Ow-local relationship reflects a change in salinity effect on the studied site in association with sea-level lowering. Alternatively, one would argue that the low sea-level stand prevents water inflow from the ECS to the Japan Sea, resulting in reduced freshwater transport into the Japan Sea and increased salinity variability in the northern ECS. Therefore, we conclude that SST and δ18Ow-local reconstructions with salinity correction are a better estimate than the calibration without salinity correction.

Calibrating the local salinity variations

We interpret the δ18Ow-local as a proxy for SSS and will refer to it in the discussion as such. In the modern ECS, a linear salinity-δ18Ow relationship is confirmed (e.g., Horikawa et al. 2015), reflecting mixing between the freshwater from the Changjiang River and seawater (Kuroshio Water) (e.g., Horikawa et al. 2015; Kubota et al. 2015). Namely, the salinity and δ18Ow at the studied site can be interpreted in the context of a simplified two endmember mixing model of the freshwater from the Changjiang River and Kuroshio Water (Kubota et al. 2015). By contrast, the following factors are involved in controlling the ECS δ18Ow in the past: (1) changes in δ18Ow and salinity in the source region and (2) changes in mixing ratio between the Changjiang River freshwater and Kuroshio Water (salinity at the studied site). An effect of the global ice volume is also involved in the changes in endmember δ18Ow and salinity. As the calibration method of “endmember correction” described in the “Methods/Experimental” section incorporates the changes in endmember δ18Ow and salinity in the source region through time, the result derived from these calculations gives a better estimate, especially for the salinity. As a result, neither SST nor δ18Ow with “endmember correction” has a large difference from those with “salinity correction” (Fig. 3), indicating that the “salinity correction” is a reasonably close approximation of those variabilities.

We utilized the δ18Osp data as the input parameter to determine the freshwater δ18O (Eq. 7) in the “endmember correction” method. In this method, we assume that the variability of the freshwater δ18O is the same as that of the δ18Osp. In general, δ18Osp can be regarded as a function of drip water δ18O and cave temperature, unless precipitation of the speleothems is at equilibrium (Hendy 1971). When drip water δ18O increases and/or cave temperature decreases, the δ18Osp increases. The absence of any identification of the kinetic effect on the published δ18Osp from the Chinese caves enables us to interpret the δ18Osp as reflecting drip water δ18O and cave temperature (Wang et al. 2008). The assumption we apply to Eq. 7 does not incorporate the temperature component in estimating the endmember freshwater δ18O. However, the cave temperature variability, if it is deduced from the SST in the ECS, would be correlated with the temporal variation in δ18Osp (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Thus, incorporating the temperature component is supposed to suppress the variability of the endmember freshwater δ18O and the calculation without the temperature component results in giving a maximum range of the variability of the freshwater δ18Ow. Moreover, high variability in the freshwater δ18O is expected to decrease the salinity variability or freshwater contribution in the northern ECS (Eqs. 6 and 7). Nevertheless, the SSS reconstruction with “endmember correction” still shows high variability in KR07-12 PC-01 (ca. ± 1) during MIS 3 (Fig. 3), indicating that the changes in endmember δ18Ow have little impact in the northern ECS. Even though the freshwater δ18O is highly variable with the amplitude of ± 1‰, its effect is diminished at the studied site due to a smaller contribution of the freshwater to the northern ECS compared with the seawater. Furthermore, neither the variability in δ18Ow nor the salinity in the western Pacific warm pool has a significant impact on the SSS reconstruction in the ECS.

Changes in SST, local seawater δ18O, and SSS

The output data from “endmember correction” will be used for discussion hereafter. As planktic foraminifer G. ruber s.s. is abundant in warm seasons in the northern ECS (Yamasaki et al. 2010), we interpret that our results reflect the signals of the warm months (Kubota et al. 2015). The δ18O, SST, and δ18Ow-local of KR07-12 PC-01 replicate those of U1429 (Additional file 3: Figure S3), but have higher time resolution. The SST of core KR07-12 PC-01 ranges from 20.2 °C to 24.4 °C, with an average of 22.3 ± 0.7 °C (1σ) during MIS 3 (Figs. 3 and 4), characterized by 1–3 °C amplitude variations at the millennial scale. The SST increases at D-O interstadials 10 and 9 in Greenland and decreases in association with Heinrich event 4 (H4). Four high SST events from 38 to 32 ka can be correlated to D-O interstadials 8–5. Heinrich event 3 (H3) is recognizable, but the magnitude of the decrease in SST is similar to other SST minima. While D-O interstadial 3 is evident in the SST records, D-O interstadial 4 is less distinct. Heinrich event 2 (H2) is characterized by a pronounced decrease in SST by ~ 3 °C. The average SST in LGM is 22.3 °C, which is the same as that in MIS 3. Thus, the LGM is not the coldest period in the last 44 ka. This is a regional phenomenon as a similar trend is found in the middle Okinawa Trough (Chen et al. 2010) and western Pacific warm pool (Stott et al. 2002) based on Mg/Ca-based SST from G. ruber. However, alkenone-based SST, which is interpreted as reflecting an annual mean SST, shows the lowest values during LGM in the northern ECS (Ijiri et al. 2005; Clemens et al. 2018). The proxy-dependent results suggest seasonality in the SST evolution since the last glacial period.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Comparison of the ECS records and other regions. a δ18O from NGRIP with age model GICC05 (Svensson et al. 2008). b SST (black) and c SSS (black) of KR07–12 PC-01 with 1σ uncertainties superimposed on δ18Osp (orange) from China (Cheng et al. 2016). d L* (purple; Bassinot and Blatzer 2002) and ESR (green; Nagashima et al. 2011) of MD01-2407 in the Japan Sea, recalibrated to IntCal13. e Gulang mean grain size, Loess Plateau, China (Sun et al. 2012). Heinrich events 2 (H2), 3 (H3), and 4 (H4) are highlighted in blue. D-O cycle numbers are shown in the NGRIP δ18O. The high SSS events in the ECS are highlighted in yellow. The 14C-based datums (circles) and tie points (crosses) are shown in b for KR07-12 PC-01 and in d for MD01-2407. Red triangles (AT) represent AT tephra

The SSS in the northern ECS is highly variable, ranging from 31.5–34.0 during MIS 3. Millennial-scale variation is recognized in SSS with major negative peaks in association with D-O interstadials 10–5 and 3 (Fig. 4). A predominant positive shift is found at H4, while H3 is less distinct. SST and SSS tend to covary on the millennial scale (H4, D-O 8, D-O 5, and H3). Contrary to the other high SSS events in association with H4 and H3, H2 is characterized by a negative shift, which suggests an alternative underlying mechanism of the EASM precipitation.

Regional and global factors affecting the Japan Sea records

Temporal variation in lightness (L*) of the hemipelagic sediments in the Japan Sea shows a millennial-scale temporal change similar to δ18O of the Greenland ice cores (Tada et al. 1995; Wang and Oba 1998; Tada et al. 1999). The L* of the sediment principally reflects organic carbon content (Corg), which is controlled by primary production and burial rate, except for during the lowest sea-level stand, such as LGM, when L* is affected by pyrite content (Tada et al. 1999). Tada et al. (1999) suggested that changes in freshwater discharge from the Changjiang and Yellow Rivers, and consequent changes in the spatial extent of the nutrient-rich and low-salinity ECS coastal water, were the main cause of changes in a nutrient influx into the Japan Sea, and primary production there during MIS 3. The increased influence of the ECS coastal water not only enhanced primary productivity, but also reduced deep-water ventilation, leading to the development of the anoxic bottom waters and deposition of the dark layers (Tada et al. 1999; Irino et al. 2018). This hypothesis can be tested by comparing the temporal variations in the SSS in the northern ECS with L* of the hemipelagic sediments in the Japan Sea (Watanabe et al. 2007). While the nutrient and salinity flux into the Japan Sea is regulated by the EASM, the strength of the East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) is a crucial factor to form a high-oxygenated deep-water mass called the Japan Sea Proper Water (JSPW) (Suda 1932; Nitani 1972; Ikehara and Fujine 2012; Gamo et al. 2014). The cold winds of the winter monsoon cool the surface water along the far eastern coast of Russia and promote the formation of sea ice, which increases the sea surface density to form the JSPW (Suda 1932; Nitani 1972). In addition to the factors described above, sea-level change controls the influx of the ECS waters into the Japan Sea as the narrow and shallow Tsushima Strait prevents the inflow of the ECS waters at a low sea-level stand. As the Japan Sea is connected to other ocean basins only through shallow (< 130 m in sill depth) and narrow (< 90 km in width) straits in addition to the Tsushima Strait, the sea-level change and resulting restriction of the seawater inflow from other basins are crucial to control the SSS in the Japan Sea. Thus, the following three climatic/oceanic factors that potentially control the sediment color of the Japan Sea are discussed in this section: (1) SSS in the northern ECS, (2) EAWM strength, and (3) global sea-level change. Factors 1 and 3 regulate the nutrient influx into the Japan Sea, while all three factors are involved in the deep-water formation and decomposition of the organic material in the sediment-water interface on the sea floor.

In this study, we used a high time resolution (1 cm interval) L* record of core MD01-2407 in the Japan Sea (Bassinot and Blatzer 2002), which was recalibrated to calendar ages using Marine13 (Additional file 5, Additional file 6: Figure S4, and Additional file 7: Table S2), for comparison among the records (Fig. 4). The temporal resolution of the 1 cm interval data is approximately 120 years. In the intervals 44–34 ka (D-O11–7) and 30–28 ka (H3–D-O 4), the Japan Sea L* profile varies in phase with the northern ECS SSS. The dark (light) layers are correlated to the low (high) SSS in the northern ECS. Since AT tephra is found in both cores, the timing of each environmental change in both seas can be constrained (Fig. 2). In the Japan Sea, AT tephra is found at the base of the light later (H3), which is correlated with one of the high SSS events in the ECS. Based on the comparison above, the changes in the SSS in the northern ECS and consequent changes in nutrient and salinity input into the Japan Sea had been a dominant factor altering the sediment color in the Japan Sea in these intervals. The variations in SSS in the northern ECS and associating surface water density in the Japan Sea had been amplifying the variability of the sediment color through the process of production of deep water (Tada et al. 1999). The variations in the EAWM probably had also enhanced the variability of the sediment color during this time period. In fact, a high-resolution quartz grain size record of loess from Gulang section in the Chinese Loess Plateau, which is an indicator of EAWM, shows a good correlation with the L* during the interval 44–34 ka. By contrast, the millennial-scale linkage between the northern ECS and Japan Sea became less clear after 34 ka, which is probably linked to the sea-level lowering. Lambeck et al. (2014) have reported a rapid sea-level fall (by ~ 40 m in less than 2000 years) at ~ 30 ka, following the gradual fall starting from ~ 35 ka. The rapid and substantial fall in sea level from ~ − 80 to ~ − 120 m at 30 ka would have reduced the water exchange between the northern ECS and Japan Sea from 20% of today to almost zero (Additional file 8: Figure S5). Previous studies have revealed that the SSS in the Japan Sea had been lowering toward LGM, which was inferred from a shift to low values in planktic foraminiferal δ18O in the Japan Sea after 30 ka (Oba et al. 1991; Kido et al. 2007; Sagawa et al. 2018). The sediment facies of the dark layers also shifted from bioturbated layers interbedded by fine laminations to finely laminated layers in association with the decrease in the SSS in the Japan Sea around 28 ka (Watanabe et al. 2007). This facies change is accompanied by an increase in S/Corg, suggesting the euxinic condition in the bottom water (Watanabe et al. 2007), likely caused by the poor ventilation of the bottom water and not by the increase in the primary productivity, as the nutrient input from the ECS was reduced significantly (Watanabe et al. 2007). The comparison of the SSS in the ECS and L* in this study indicates that they are not correlated well in this interval, suggesting the millennial-scale variations in the ECS SSS had almost no impact on the Japan Sea at the lower sea level. Thus, there seems to be a threshold around the sea level of − 80 to − 120 m from a mode where the Japan Sea responds well to the ECS variation to the other mode where it does not. Meanwhile, one still can find interbedded light layers, such as H2, after 28 ka (Watanabe et al. 2007). These light layers might be caused by a different mechanism from those during MIS 3. We speculate that deposition of the light layers might be involved in a millennial-scale sea-level rise that increases the ECS water influx to increase the density of the Japan Sea. In this case, the deep water ventilation plays a more significant role in controlling the L*. Although the timing of the rapid sea-level rise is an issue (Yokoyama and Esat 2011), based on studies on an oxygen isotope record from the Red Sea and isotopes in corals from Papua New Guinea, it is now accepted that 15–20 m, and possibly up to 30 m, of sea level increases is associated with Heinrich events (Broecker 1994; Siddall et al. 2003; Yokoyama and Esat 2011), or with the warm period after the termination of a Heinrich event (Arz et al. 2007). A change in sea level of 15–20 m corresponds to over 10% change in the cross section in the Tsushima Strait, potentially leading a massive change in the water volume exchange between the two ocean basins.

Summer precipitation variability and westerly jet in East Asia

The most prominent feature in our new records is that the SSS in the ECS varies in association with the D-O cycles, which can provide fundamental information on summer precipitation changes under the EASM system. Although the Chinese δ18Osp is one of the most well-known proxies from the EASM region, the interpretation of the Chinese δ18Osp is still controversial on a millennial-scale (e.g., Zhang et al. 2018). In the earlier stage of the studies on δ18Osp, the δ18Osp were interpreted as the amount of summer precipitation at a given cave location (Wang et al. 2001). Subsequently, other interpretations were proposed: the fraction of water vapor removed from air masses along the moisture trajectory between the tropical Indo-Pacific and the cave sites (Hu et al. 2008) or isotopic fluctuation in the moisture source region (Pausata et al. 2011). By contrast, the most recent study argued that the δ18Osp is better understood as a measure of the large-scale monsoon circulation, not reflecting the local precipitation (Liu et al. 2014). This interpretation is also put forward in a study on trace elements of speleothems, which suggests a wetter condition in H1 and Younger Dryas during the last deglaciation (Zhang et al. 2018). In their discussion, when the δ18Osp becomes heavier, which is traditionally interpreted as “weak monsoon,” the local summer rainfall increases in the Changjiang River catchment basin (Zhang et al. 2018). Our new SSS result indicates that most D-O stadials and H4 and H3 intervals correspond to less EASM precipitation and D-O interstadials correspond to more EASM precipitation. Our result contradicts what was claimed in Zhang et al. (2018), suggesting that the millennial-scale summer precipitation response might depend on a global climate setting, such as sea level. In fact, H2 in the ECS, characterized by the decreased SSS, is different from other stadials and Heinrichs. A complex response in the summer precipitation was also suggested based on pollen record from Lake Suigetsu, central Japan, which indicates a wetter condition during H1 compared to the following Bølling-Allerød (Nakagawa et al. 2006).

The SSS variation in the ECS and its relationship to the westerly jet will give us a new insight into the variability of summer precipitation and its relationship to monsoon circulation itself. Today, the EASM front migrates northward from South China from May and reaches the North China-Inner Mongolia regions in August. From the meteorological aspect, the northward migration of the EASM front follows the northward shift of the westerly jet over East Asia on a seasonal scale (Sampe and Xie 2010). Therefore, a proxy of the position of the westerly jet is regarded as an indicator of the EASM circulation. On an interannual time scale, the negative correlation between EASM rainfall in the Changjiang River basin and the summer southerly wind intensity in the northernmost region of the EASM was observed (Jiang et al. 2008); the EASM circulation was stronger, and the Changjiang River basin had less precipitation. A similar relationship was observed on a millennial-scale during the Holocene, based on a proxy of the westerly jet and summer precipitation records from inland China and ECS (Nagashima et al. 2013). According to Nagashima et al. (2011), the position of the westerly jet has varied in harmony with D-O cycles in MIS 3, based on the electron spin resonance (ESR) signal intensity of quartz in the fine silt fraction of the Japan Sea sediments, which is interpreted as a proxy for dust provenance, sourced either from the Taklimakan Desert or the Mongolian Gobi (Fig. 4). The higher (lower) ESR signal intensity during stadials (interstadials) suggests the southern (northern) position of the westerly jet and weaker (stronger) EASM circulation (Nagashima et al. 2011). In the interval 44–34 ka, the increased EASM precipitation in the Changjiang River basin followed the northward shift of the westerly jet position (EASM front), which was opposite to what was observed on a millennial-scale during the Holocene (Nagashima et al. 2013) and on an interannual to decadal scale today (e.g., Jiang et al. 2008).

Global context of East Asian monsoon variations

A comparison of the Chinese δ18Osp record and loess grain size indicates that the EASM and EAWM are coupled on a millennial time scale during the interval 60–34 ka (Sun et al. 2012). Their variations are well correlated to the North Atlantic climate variability as well (Sun et al. 2012). In the study of Sun et al. (2012), North Atlantic water-hosing experiments, using the Community Climate System Model Version 3 to mimic the Heinrich or stadial events, suggest a dynamical response of the EASM and EAWM systems to the suppressed Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and cooling in the North Atlantic. The freshwater forcing increases the latitudinal temperature gradient and induces stronger EAWM during winter (Sun et al. 2012). During summer, cooling in North Atlantic results in a southward shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone, followed by a stronger Walker circulation and weaker EASM (Zhang and Delworth 2005). The moisture convergence along the EASM front and precipitation in the Changjiang River basin is suppressed as the North Pacific subtropical high weakens in response to the freshwater forcing during summer (Sun et al. 2012). However, an opposite summer precipitation response is suggested in a numerical simulation using the Community Earth System Model (Zhang et al. 2018). In this simulation, a stronger meridional temperature gradient, and resultant southward-shifted and strengthened westerly jet, leads to enhanced convection along the slope of the Tibetan Plateau, increased precipitation in southern China, and decreased precipitation in northern China. Thus, the precipitation response in the East Asian monsoon region depends on the climate models, being not constrained by the numerical models as depicted in Kageyama et al. (2013). Conversely, our records give a constraint on the mechanism of the EASM response to AMOC variability during MIS 3, suggesting that the decreased precipitation in Heinrichs is caused by the reduction of the moisture supply from the surrounding oceans, probably linked to the weakening of the subtropical high in the North Pacific (Sun et al. 2012). We infer that, under this mechanism, the migration pattern of the westerly jet and associated position of the EASM front do not regulate the special summer precipitation distribution in the same manner as today, but moisture budget in the atmosphere plays a dominant role. However, an alternative explanation is required for the opposing precipitation trend, such as H2 and H1, when the summer precipitation pattern is opposite to what is observed for MIS 3. A recent study points out that the internal climate variability is important in the rainfall variation in East Asia’s mid-latitude on an interannual and decadal scale today (Ueda et al. 2015). Internal variability is the natural variability of the climate system that occurs in the absence of external forcing, and includes processes intrinsic to the atmosphere, the ocean, and the coupled ocean-atmosphere system (Deser et al. 2010; Deser et al. 2012). Interannual and decadal scale variabilities arise from the intrinsic variability of the system due to a random stochastic process and results from dynamic and thermodynamic interactions of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system (Deser et al. 2012). Ueda et al. (2015) argue that today’s interannual and interdecadal precipitation pattern over mid-latitude East Asia is caused by a combination of the atmospheric internal variability and SST in the western Pacific and Indian Ocean. On a millennial time scale, the EAWM variability after 30 ka, decoupled to the North Atlantic climate (Sun et al. 2012), appears to lack the forcing outside of the East Asian climate system, perhaps resulting from the increased intrinsic variability of the EAWM. One would argue that the increased summer precipitation in southern China in H2 and H1 is interpreted as reflecting the increased convection along the slope of the Tibetan Plateau, induced by the longer placement of the EASM front in the southern position (Zhang et al. 2018). Alternatively, however, the summer precipitation response in H2 and H1 may be explained in the context of the random stochastic processes in the EASM system as well as the EAWM. In the latter case, the overall monsoon system in East Asia would randomly vary, rather than responding to the North Atlantic forcing during MIS 2. Either way, the opposite millennial-scale EASM precipitation pattern during MIS 2 leads to a conclusion that the regional precipitation is not a dominant factor controlling the millennial-scale Chinese δ18Osp in this period.

Conclusion

We reconstructed SST, δ18Ow -local, and SSS using the paired Mg/Ca and δ18Op in the northern ECS. To better estimate the SSS variability, we tested the three calibration methods to reconstruct these records. The SST record derived from the Mg/Ca calibration without salinity correction shows higher variability than the one with salinity correction, and its variability depends on the sea level. The SSS reconstruction is not significantly affected by the endmember δ18Ow and salinity variability in the source regions, indicating that the modern local δ18Ow-salinity calibration is applicable to the MIS 3 case. The most prominent feature of our SSS record is the millennial-scale variations in association with the D-O cycle in Greenland and the Chinese δ18Osp, where high SSS events coincide with D-O stadials and Heinrichs, while low SSS events coincide with D-O interstadials. The comparison of the SSS in the northern ECS, the proxy of the EAWM, and the sediment color in the Japan Sea reveal that the changes in nutrient and salinity flux in the Japan Sea induced by the Changjiang River discharge in addition to the strength of the EAWM are likely the primary factors determining the surface productivity changes manifesting as color changes in the sediments of the Japan Sea when the sea level was higher than ca. − 80 m. The glacioeustatic sea-level changes reduced the influx of the ECS coastal water entering into the Japan Sea, especially after ~ 30 ka, at which the linkage between the SSS in the northern ECS and the sediment color of the Japan Sea became less clear.

The SSS variation in the ECS and its relationship to the westerly jet indicates that the decreased EASM precipitation in the Changjiang River basin followed the southward shift of the westerly jet position, which is opposite to what was observed on a millennial-scale during the Holocene and interannual time scale today. We infer that the moisture convergence along the EASM front and overall moisture budget in the atmosphere, which would be altered in association with the D-O cycles and Heinrichs, plays a dominant role in controlling the EASM precipitation in southern China during MIS 3. The precipitation response during MIS 2 is opposite to MIS 3, suggesting the alternative mechanism involved at different global climate backgrounds.

Abbreviations

EASM: 

East Asian summer monsoon

EAWM: 

East Asian winter monsoon

ECS: 

East China Sea

JSPW: 

Japan Sea Proper Water

LGM: 

Last Glacial Maximum

MIS: 

Marine Isotope Stage

δ18O: 

Oxygen isotope

δ18Op

Oxygen isotope of planktic foraminifera

δ18Osp

Oxygen isotope of speleothems

δ18Ow

Oxygen isotope of water

δ18Ow-local

Oxygen isotope of local seawater

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the onboard scientists and cruise staffs of KR07-12. We also thank T. Omura, H. Yamamoto, M. Takada, M. Sato, Y. Nakamura, N. Kisen, N. Nakamura, and A. Kobayashi for their assistance in our experiments. We are grateful to K. Nagashima, T. Sagawa, T. Irino, and T. Nakagawa for their helpful comment and suggestion.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI Grant supported this work number 23221022 awarded to RT, and grants from the National Museum of Nature and Science and Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT, Japan). A grant-in-aid funded YK for JSPS Fellows, grant number 10914, and Program for Advancing Strategic International Networks to Accelerate the Circulation of Talented Researchers, grant number R2901.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

The data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in this article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

RT proposed the topic for YK’s doctoral research. YK carried out the experimental study under the guidance of RT and KK. MU and KI analyzed the 14C and tephra, respectively, and helped in their interpretation. YK wrote a draft of the manuscript, and RT collaborated with the corresponding author in the construction of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

RT was a co-chief scientist of KR07-12, and YK and KI were on-board scientists of KR07-12. RT and KK supervised YK’s doctoral research.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan
(2)
Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-Cho, Yokosuka Kanagawa, 237-0061, Japan
(3)
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science,, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
(4)
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan
(5)
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan

References

  1. Andres M, Park J-H, Wimbush M, Zhu X-H, Chang K-I, Ichikawa H (2008) Study of the Kuroshio/Ryukyu current system based on satellite-altimeter and in situ measurements. J Oceanogr 64:937–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-008-0077-2 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonov JI, Seidov D, Boyer TP, Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Garcia HE, Baranova OK, Zweng MM, Johnson DR (2010) World ocean atlas 2009, volume 2: salinity. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Arz HW, Lamy F, Ganopolski A, Nowaczyk N, Pätzold J (2007) Dominant Northern Hemisphere climate control over millennial-scale glacial sea-level variability. Quat Sci Rev 26:312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.016 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassinot F, Blatzer A (2002) WEPAMA Cruise MD 122 - IMAGES VII: Leg 1, Port Hedland (Australia), 01-05-2001 to Keelung (Taiwan), 26-05-2001; Leg 2, Keelung (Taiwan), 27-05-2001 to Kochi (Japan), 18-06-2001. Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile VictorGoogle Scholar
  5. Bemis BE, Spero HJ, Bijma J, Lea DW (1998) Reevaluation of the oxygen isotopic composition of planktonic foraminifera: experimental results and revised paleotemperature equations. Paleoceanography 13:150–160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolliet T, Holbourn A, Kuhnt W, Laj C, Kissel C, Beaufort L, Kienast M, Andersen N, Garbe-Schönberg D (2011) Mindanao dome variability over the last 160 kyr: episodic glacial cooling of the West Pacific warm pool. Paleoceanography 26:1050–1018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA001966 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle EA, Keigwin LD (1985) Comparison of Atlantic and Pacific paleochemical records for the last 215,000 years: changes in deep ocean circulation and chemical inventories. Earth Planet Sci Lett 76:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(85)90154-2 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Broecker WS (1994) Massive iceberg discharges as triggers for global climate change. Nature 372:421–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/372421a0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen C, Beardsley RC, Limeburner R, Kim K (1994) Comparison of winter and summer hydrographic observations in the Yellow and East China Seas and adjacent Kuroshio during 1986. Cont Shelf Res 14:909–928View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen MT, Lin XP, Chang YP, Chen YC, Lo L, Shen CC, Yokoyama Y, Oppo DW, Thompson WG, Zhang R (2010) Dynamic millennial-scale climate changes in the northwestern Pacific over the past 40,000 years. Geophys Res Lett 37:L23603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045202 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng H, Edwards RL, Sinha A, Spötl C, Yi L, Chen S, Kelly M, Kathayat G, Wang X, Li X, Kong X, Wang Y, Ning Y, Zhang H (2016) The Asian monsoon over the past 640,000 years and ice age terminations. Nature 534:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng H, Edwards RL, Southon J, Matsumoto K, Feinberg JM, Sinha A, Zhou W, Li H, Li X, Xu Y, Chen S, Tan M, Wang Q, Wang Y, Ning Y (2018) Atmospheric 14C/12C changes during the last glacial period from Hulu Cave. Science 362:1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0747 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Clemens SC, Holbourn A, Kubota Y, Lee KE, Liu Z, Chen G, Nelson A, Fox-Kemper B (2018) Precession-band variance missing from East Asian monsoon runoff. Nat Commun 9:3364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05814-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Clemens SC, Prell WL, Sun Y (2010) Orbital-scale timing and mechanisms driving Late Pleistocene Indo-Asian summer monsoons: reinterpreting cave speleothem δ18O. Paleoceanography 25:PA4207. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010pa001926 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Conroy JL, Thompson DM, Cobb KM, Noone D, Rea S, LeGrande AN (2017) Spatiotemporal variability in the δ18O-salinity relationship of seawater across the tropical Pacific Ocean. Paleoceanography 32:484–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003073 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Danhara T, Yamashita T, Iwano H, Kasuya M (1992) An improved system for measuring refractive index using the thermal immersion method. Quat Int 13-14:89–91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dansgaard W, Johnsen SJ, Clausen HB, Dahl-Jensen D, Gundestrup NS, Hammer CU, Hvidberg CS, Steffensen JP, Sveinbjörnsdottir AE, Jouzel J, Bond G (1993) Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core record. Nature 364:218–220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dayem KE, Molnar P, Battisti DS, Roe GH (2010) Lessons learned from oxygen isotopes in modern precipitation applied to interpretation of speleothem records of paleoclimate from eastern Asia. Earth Planet Sci Lett 295:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.003 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dekens PS, Lea DW, Pak DK, Spero HJ (2002) Core top calibration of Mg/Ca in tropical foraminifera: refining paleotemperature estimation. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 3:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000200 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Deser C, Knutti R, Solomon S, Phillips AS (2012) Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate. Nat Clim Chang 2:775–779. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1562 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Deser C, Phillips A, Bourdette V, Teng H (2010) Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim Dyn 38:527–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamo T, Nakayama N, Takahata N, Sano Y, Zhang J, Yamazaki E, Taniyasu S, Yamashita N (2014) The Sea of Japan and its unique chemistry revealed by time-series observations over the last 30 years. Monogr Environ Earth Planets 2:1–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hathorne EC, Gagnon A, Felis T, Adkins J, Asami R, Boer W, Caillon N, Case D, Cobb KM, Douville E, deMenocal P, Eisenhauer A, Garbe-Schönberg D, Geibert W, Goldstein S, Hughen K, Inoue M, Kawahata H, Kölling M, Cornec FL, Linsley BK, McGregor HV, Montagna P, Nurhati IS, Quinn TM, Raddatz J, Rebaubier H, Robinson L, Sadekov A, Sherrell R, Sinclair D, Tudhope AW, Wei G, Wong H, Wu HC, You C-F (2013) Interlaboratory study for coral Sr/Ca and other element/Ca ratio measurements. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:3730–3750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20230 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hendy CH (1971) The isotopic geochemistry of speleothems—I. The calculation of the effects of different modes of formation on the isotopic composition of speleothems and their applicability as palaeoclimatic indicators. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 35:801–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(71)90127-X View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Horikawa K, Kodaira T, Zhang J, Murayama M (2015) δ18Osw estimate for Globigerinoides ruber from core-top sediments in the East China Sea. Prog Earth Planet Sci 2:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0048-3 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu C, Henderson GM, Huang J, Xie S, Sun Y, Johnson KR (2008) Quantification of Holocene Asian monsoon rainfall from spatially separated cave records. Earth Planet Sci Lett 266:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.015 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ichikawa H, Beardsley RC (1993) Temporal and spatial variability of volume transport of the Kuroshio in the East China Sea. Deep-Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 40:583–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(93)90147-U View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ichikawa H, Beardsley RC (2002) The current system in the Yellow and East China Seas. J Oceanogr 58:77–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ijiri A, Wang L, Oba T, Kawahata H, Huang CY (2005) Paleoenvironmental changes in the northern area of the East China Sea during the past 42,000 years. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 219:239–261View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ikehara K, Fujine K (2012) Fluctuations in the Late Quaternary East Asian winter monsoon recorded in sediment records of surface water cooling in the northern Japan Sea. J Quat Sci 27:866–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2573 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Inoue M, Yoshida K, Minakawa M, Kiyomoto Y, Kofuji H, Nagao S, Hamajima Y, Yamamoto M (2012) Spatial variations of 226Ra, 228Ra, and 228Th activities in seawater from the eastern East China Sea. Geochem J 46:429–441View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Irino T, Tada R, Ikehara K, Sagawa T, Karasuda A, Kurokawa S, Seki A, Lu S (2018) Construction of perfectly continuous records of physical properties for dark-light sediment sequences collected from the Japan Sea during Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 346 and their potential utilities as paleoceanographic studies. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0176-7 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Isobe A, Ando M, Watanabe T, Senjyu T, Sugihara S, Manda A (2002) Freshwater and temperature transports through the Tsushima-Korea Straits. J Geophys Res 107:3065. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000702 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Japan Oceanographic Data Center (2004) Statistical Products. https://www.jodc.go.jp/jodcweb. Accessed 1 Apr 2019
  35. Jia Q, Li T, Xiong Z, Steinke S, Jiang F, Chang F, Qin B (2018) Hydrological variability in the western tropical Pacific over the past 700kyr and its linkage to Northern Hemisphere climatic change. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 493:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.12.039 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiang Z, Yang S, He J, Li J, Liang J (2008) Interdecadal variations of East Asian summer monsoon northward propagation and influences on summer precipitation over East China. Meteorog Atmos Phys 100:101–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0298-3 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kageyama M, Merkel U, Otto-Bliesner B, Prange M, Abe-Ouchi A, Lohmann G, Ohgaito R, Roche DM, Singarayer J, Swingedouw D (2013) Climatic impacts of fresh water hosing under Last Glacial Maximum conditions: a multi-model study. Clim Past 9:935–953. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-935-2013 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kido Y, Minami I, Tada R, Fujine K, Irino T, Ikehara K, Chun JH (2007) Orbital-scale stratigraphy and high-resolution analysis of biogenic components and deep-water oxygenation conditions in the Japan Sea during the last 640 kyr. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 247:32–49View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim RA, Lee KE, Bae SW (2015) Sea surface temperature proxies (alkenones, foraminiferal Mg/Ca, and planktonic foraminiferal assemblage) and their implications in the Okinawa Trough. Prog Earth Planet Sci 2:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0074-1 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kubota Y, Kimoto K, Tada R, Oda H, Yokoyama Y, Matsuzaki H (2010) Variations of East Asian summer monsoon since the last deglaciation based on Mg/Ca and oxygen isotope of planktic foraminifera in the northern East China Sea. Paleoceanography 25:PA4205. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001891 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kubota Y, Tada R, Kimoto K (2015) Changes in East Asian summer monsoon precipitation during the Holocene deduced from a freshwater flux reconstruction of the Changjiang (Yangtze River) based on the oxygen isotope mass balance in the northern East China Sea. Clim Past 11:265–281. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-265-2015 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Lambeck K, Rouby H, Purcell A, Sun Y, Sambridge M (2014) Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:15296–15303. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411762111 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lea DW, Mashiotta TA, Spero HJ (1999) Controls on magnesium and strontium uptake in planktonic foraminifera determined by live culturing. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:2369–2379View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. LeGrande AN, Schmidt GA (2011) Water isotopologues as a quantitative paleosalinity proxy. Paleoceanography 26:PA3225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010pa002043 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu Z, Wen X, Brady EC, Otto-Bliesner B, Yu G, Lu H, Cheng H, Wang Y, Zheng W, Ding Y, Edwards RL, Cheng J, Liu W, Yang H (2014) Chinese cave records and the East Asia summer monsoon. Quat Sci Rev 83:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.10.021 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Garcia HE (2010) World ocean atlas 2009, volume 1: temperature. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  47. Maher BA, Thompson R (2012) Oxygen isotopes from Chinese caves: records not of monsoon rainfall but of circulation regime. J Quat Sci 27:615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2553 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagashima K, Tada R, Tani A, Sun Y, Isozaki Y, Toyoda S, Hasegawa H (2011) Millennial-scale oscillations of the westerly jet path during the last glacial period. J Asian Earth Sci 40:1214–1220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagashima K, Tada R, Toyoda S (2013) Westerly jet-East Asian summer monsoon connection during the Holocene. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:5041–5053. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gc004931 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakagawa T, Tarasov PE, Kitagawa H, Yasuda Y, Gotanda K (2006) Seasonally specific responses of the East Asian monsoon to deglacial climate changes. Geology 34:521–524View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Nitani H (1972) On the deep and bottom waters in the Japan Sea. In: Shoji D (ed) Research in hydrography and oceanograph. Hydrographic Department of Japan, pp 151–201Google Scholar
  52. Oba T (1988) Comment for sea level change. The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu) 26:243-250, (in Japanese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.26.3_243 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Oba T, Kato M, Kitazato H, Koizumi I, Omura A, Sakai T, Takayama T (1991) Paleoenvironmental changes in the Japan Sea during the last 85,000 years. Paleoceanography 6:499–518View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Okuno M, Nakamura T, Moriwaki H, Kobayashi T (1997) AMS radiocarbon dating of the Sakurajima tephra group, southern Kyushu, Japan. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 123:470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00614-3 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Pausata FSR, Battisti DS, Nisancioglu KH, Bitz CM (2011) Chinese stalagmite δ18O controlled by changes in the Indian monsoon during a simulated Heinrich event. Nat Geosci 4:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1169 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, Buck CE, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Haflidason H, Hajdas I, Hatté C, Heaton TJ, Hoffmann DL, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, Manning SW, Niu M, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Scott EM, Southon JR, Staff RA, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J (2013) IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Sagawa T, Nagahashi Y, Satoguchi Y, Holbourn A, Itaki T, Gallagher SJ, Saavedra-Pellitero M, Ikehara K, Irino T, Tada R (2018) Integrated tephrostratigraphy and stable isotope stratigraphy in the Japan Sea and East China Sea using IODP sites U1426, U1427, and U1429, expedition 346 Asian monsoon. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0168-7 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Sampe T, Xie S-P (2010) Large-scale dynamics of the meiyu-baiu rainband: environmental forcing by the westerly jet. J Clim 23:113–134. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli3128.1 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Siddall M, Rohling EJ, Almogi-Labin A, Hemleben C, Meischner D, Schmelzer I, Smeed DA (2003) Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith VC, Staff RA, Blockley SPE, Bronk Ramsey C, Nakagawa T, Mark DF, Takemura K, Danhara T (2013) Identification and correlation of visible tephras in the Lake Suigetsu SG06 sedimentary archive, Japan: chronostratigraphic markers for synchronising of east Asian/West Pacific palaeoclimatic records across the last 150 ka. Quat Sci Rev 67:121–137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Stott L, Poulsen C, Lund S, Thunell R (2002) Super ENSO and global climate oscillations at millennial time scales. Science 297:222–226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Reimer RW (2016) CALIB radiocarbon calibration version 7.1. In: calib.qub.ac.uk http://calib.org/calib/. Accessed 1 Apr 2019
  63. Suda K (1932) On the bottom water in the Japan Sea (preliminary report). Kaiyojiho 4:221–240Google Scholar
  64. Sun Y, Clemens SC, Morrill C, Lin X, Wang X, An Z (2012) Influence of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation on the East Asian winter monsoon. Nat Geosci 5:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1326 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Sun Y, Oppo DW, Xiang R, Liu W, Gao S (2005) Last deglaciation in the Okinawa Trough: subtropical Northwest Pacific link to Northern Hemisphere and tropical climate. Paleoceanography 20:PA4005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004pa001061 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Svensson A, Andersen KK, Bigler M, Clausen HB, Dahl-Jensen D, Davies SM, Johnsen SJ, Muscheler R, Parrenin F, Rasmussen SO, Röthlisberger R, Seierstad I, Steffensen JP, Vinther BM (2008) A 60,000 year Greenland stratigraphic ice core chronology. Clim Past 4:47–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Tada R, Irino T, Ikehara K, Karasuda A, Sugisaki S, Xuan C, Sagawa T, Itaki T, Kubota Y, Lu S, Seki A, Murray RW, Alvarez-Zarikian C, Anderson WT, Bassetti M-A, Brace BJ, Clemens SC, da Costa Gurgel MH, Dickens GR, Dunlea AG, Gallagher SJ, Giosan L, Henderson ACG, Holbourn AE, Kinsley CW, Lee GS, Lee KE, Lofi J, Lopes CICD, Saavedra-Pellitero M, Peterson LC, Singh RK, Toucanne S, Wan S, Zheng H, Ziegler M (2018) High-resolution and high-precision correlation of dark and light layers in the Quaternary hemipelagic sediments of the Japan Sea recovered during IODP expedition 346. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0167-8 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Tada R, Irino T, Koizumi I (1995) Possible Dansgaard-Oeschger oscillation signal recorded in the Japan Sea sediments, Global fluxes of carbon and its related substances in the coastal sea-ocean-atmosphere system, Proceedings of 1994 IGBP symposium, 1995, pp 517–522Google Scholar
  69. Tada R, Irino T, Koizumi I (1999) Land-ocean linkages over orbital and millennial timescales recorded in late Quaternary sediments of the Japan Sea. Paleoceanography 14:236–247View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Tanaka A, Yoneda M, Uchida M, Uehiro T, Shibata Y, Morita M (2000) Recent advances in 14C measurement at NIES-TERRA. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 172:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00346-3 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Thirumalai K, Quinn TM, Marino G (2016) Constraining past seawater δ18O and temperature records developed from foraminiferal geochemistry. Paleoceanography 31:1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA002970 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Tierney JE, Pausata FSR, deMenocal P (2015) Deglacial Indian monsoon failure and North Atlantic stadials linked by Indian Ocean surface cooling. Nat Geosci 9:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2603 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Uchida M, Ohkushi K, Kimoto K, Inagaki F, Ishimura T, Tsunogai U, TuZino T, Shibata Y (2008) Radiocarbon-based carbon source quantification of anomalous isotopic foraminifera in last glacial sediments in the western North Pacific. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9:Q04N14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gc001558 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Uchida M, Shibata Y, Yoneda M, Kobayashi T, Morita M (2004) Technical progress in AMS microscale radiocarbon analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 223–224:313–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.062 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Udarbe-Walker MJB, Villanoy CL (2001) Structure of potential upwelling areas in the Philippines. Deep-Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 48:1499–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00100-X View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Ueda H, Kamae Y, Hayasaki M, Kitoh A, Watanabe S, Miki Y, Kumai A (2015) Combined effects of recent Pacific cooling and Indian Ocean warming on the Asian monsoon. Nat Commun 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9854 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Waelbroeck C, Labeyrie L, Michel E, Duplessy JC, McManus JF, Lambeck K, Balbon E, Labracherie M (2002) Sea-level and deep water temperature changes derived from benthic foraminifera isotopic records. Quat Sci Rev 21:295–305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang L, Oba T (1998) Tele-connections between East Asian monsoon and the high-latitude climate. Quat Res 37:211–219. https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.37.211 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang Y, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Kong X, Shao X, Chen S, Wu J, Jiang X, Wang X, An Z (2008) Millennial- and orbital-scale changes in the East Asian monsoon over the past 224,000 years. Nature 451:1090–1093. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06692 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang YJ, Cheng H, Edwards RL, An ZS, Wu JY, Shen CC, Dorale JA (2001) A high-resolution absolute-dated late Pleistocene monsoon record from Hulu Cave, China. Science 294:2345–2348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064618 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Watanabe S, Tada R, Ikehara K, Fujine K, Kido Y (2007) Sediment fabrics, oxygenation history, and circulation modes of Japan Sea during the Late Quaternary. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 247:50–64View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Yamasaki M, Murakami T, Tsuchihashi M, Oda M (2010) Seasonal variation in living planktic foraminiferal assemblage in the northeastern part of the East China Sea. Fossils 87:35–46Google Scholar
  83. Yokoyama Y, Esat TM (2011) Global climate and sea level: enduring variability and rapid fluctuations over the past 150,000 years. Oceanography 24:54–69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Yokoyama Y, Kido Y, Tada R, Minami I, Finkel RC, Matsuzaki H (2007) Japan Sea oxygen isotope stratigraphy and global sea-level changes for the last 50,000 years recorded in sediment cores from the Oki Ridge. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 247:5–17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Yoneda M, Shibata Y, Tanaka A, Uehiro T, Morita M, Uchida M, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi C, Suzuki R, Miyamoto K, Hancock B, Dibden C, Edmonds JS (2004) AMS 14C measurement and preparative techniques at NIES-TERRA. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 223–224:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.026 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Yoshikawa S (1976) The volcanic ash layers of the Osaka Group. J Geol Soc Jpn 82:497–515View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang H, Griffiths ML, Chiang JCH, Kong W, Wu S, Atwood A, Huang J, Cheng H, Ning Y, Xie S (2018) East Asian hydroclimate modulated by the position of the westerlies during termination I. Science 362:580–583. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9393 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang R, Delworth TL (2005) Simulated tropical response to a substantial weakening of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. J Clim 18:1853–1860View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement