Skip to main content

Correction to: A full sequence of the Matuyama–Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the Chiba composite section, Central Japan

The Original Article was published on 01 September 2020

Correction to: Prog Earth Planet Sci 7, 44 (2020)

Following publication of the original article by Haneda et al. (2020a), several values of authigenic 10Be/9Be in Fig. 7i and Additional file 2, and color of 6 plots around 12 m level in Fig. 7e were found to be incorrect. The corrected Fig. 7 and its caption is given below, and the corrected Additional file 2 is included in this correction. The original paper has been updated.

Fig. 7
figure 1

Stratigraphic profiles of paleomagnetic directions and rock-magnetic properties. a Latest age model for the Chiba composite section (Suganuma et al. 2018). b Benthic oxygen isotope stratigraphy (Haneda et al. 2020b). c Maximum angular deviation (MAD) with the 15° cut-off limit indicated, for the principal component analysis. d VGP latitude calculated from the results of the hybrid demagnetization method. e–h NRM30-50/ARM30-50 and NRM30-50/IRM30-50 as relative paleointensity indices calculated following the pseudo-Thellier approach of Tauxe et al. (1995), and linear correlation coefficients (R-valueARM and R-valueIRM) of the indices. i Authigenic 10Be/9Be (Simon et al. 2019) as an independent proxy of the field intensity. j Natural remanent magnetization intensity. k Low-field (kLF) and ARM magnetic susceptibility (kARM) as proxies of magnetic grain concentration. l kARM/kLF as a proxy of magnetic grain size. m S-ratio at −0.3 T and −0.1 T as a proxy of the relative abundance of antiferromagnetic to ferrimagnetic minerals. New data points obtained from the Yoro-Tabuchi section are shown as blue and light blue open circles and lines, and new data points from the Yoro River section are shown as red and orange open circles and lines. Data points from previous studies (Okada et al. 2017; Simon et al. 2019) are shown as black and gray closed circles and lines. The assignment of marine isotope stages is after Haneda et al. (2020b). ARM, anhysteretic remanent magnetization; IRM, isothermal remanent magnetization; MBB, Matuyama–Brunhes boundary; MS, magnetic susceptibility; NRM, natural remanent magnetization


Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuki Haneda.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 2.

Paleomagnetic and rock magnetic results for the Yoro River and Yoro-Tabuchi sections by Okada et al. (2017), Simon et al. (2019), and this study

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haneda, Y., Okada, M., Suganuma, Y. et al. Correction to: A full sequence of the Matuyama–Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the Chiba composite section, Central Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 8, 33 (2021).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: