Skip to content

Advertisement

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science Cover Image
Research article
Open Access

Nitrogen dynamics in a highly urbanized coastal area of western Japan: impact of sewage-derived loads

  • Mitsuyo Saito1Email author,
  • Shin-ichi Onodera2,
  • Guangzhe Jin2, 3,
  • Yuta Shimizu4 and
  • Masanobu Taniguchi5
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science20185:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0177-6

©  The Author(s). 2018

Received: 28 June 2017

Accepted: 7 March 2018

Published: 20 March 2018

Abstract

In this study, we examined the nitrogen dynamics of a highly urbanized coastal area, focusing on the impacts of sewage-derived nitrogen. High levels of dissolved inorganic nitrogen were detected in seawater near treated sewage effluent (TSE) discharge points before decreasing in the offshore direction, suggesting that the impact zone of sewage effluent is about 1–2 km from the discharge point. The stable isotope ratios of nitrate and particulate organic nitrogen suggest nitrogen uptake by phytoplankton as well as dilution by offshore seawater, which contributed to a decrease in sewage-derived nitrogen levels. However, the extent of the impact zone was controlled by tidal variations and differences in temperature between the TSE and seawater. Our results also identify nitrogen transport processes, through exchange between seawater and sediment pore water, as an additional important source of nitrogen in the study area.

Keywords

Nitrogen dynamicsCoastal areaUrbanizationSewageSediment

Introduction

Human activities significantly influence the global nitrogen cycle and natural water environments such as rivers and coastal seas (Vitousek et al. 1997; Gruber and Galloway 2008). Marine eutrophication in nearshore environments has been attributed to anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen (Nixon 1995; Howarth and Marino 2006). Water pollution from domestic sewage and industrial waste, in particular, is a critical environmental problem related to the early stages of urbanization, where there is significant growth in population (Onodera 2011). For the Osaka metropolitan area in Japan, pollution of the river and coastal areas was significant until the 1970s. Although this has been improved via the development of sewage treatment systems, the removal of nitrogen requires advanced processing, and relatively large proportions of nitrogen are still discharged in treated sewage effluent to coastal areas due to the absence of this treatment. Powley et al. (2016) estimated that nitrogen inputs from the direct discharge of treated and untreated wastewater from coastal cities to the Mediterranean Sea are of the same order of magnitude as riverine inputs. The effects of excess nitrogen supply from wastewater treatment effluent influence ecosystem structure, as well as nitrogen cycling in receiving waters (Waiser et al. 2011; Drury et al. 2013).

Garside et al. (1976) confirmed the seasonal and spatial distribution of sewage-derived nitrogen and its contribution to much of the nitrogen in the Hudson Estuary, New York, and showed that primary production was not limited by nitrogen availability. Costanzo et al. (2001) applied the nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ15N) of marine plants (seagrass, attached macroalgae, and mangroves) to detect and map the impacts of sewage-derived nitrogen and confirmed δ15N was elevated near sewage outfalls in Moreton Bay, Australia. Savage (2005) also applied the δ15N of macroalgae (Fucus vesiculosus) and coastal sediments to trace the influence of sewage-derived nitrogen. She confirmed this influence was most pronounced within 10 km of the sewage outfall of the Himmerfjärden embayment of the Baltic Sea.

Eyre (2000) demonstrated the seasonal cycle of nutrient transformation and phytoplankton growth in river-dominated sub-tropical east Australian estuaries. He confirmed that wastewater-derived dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) significantly influenced phytoplankton biomass in the estuaries. Pennino et al. (2016) examined the transformations of nitrogen derived from a wastewater treatment facility, based on the nitrogen mass balance and the δ15N and oxygen stable isotope ratios (δ18O) in the tidal Potomac River estuary from Washington, D.C., to the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and shallow bays are dynamic environments, influenced by tidal variations and inflow of freshwater from rivers and channels. Therefore, examination of the temporal dynamics of nitrogen in the sewage impact zone is important. However, the detailed transport process and dynamics of sewage-derived nitrogen were not examined in these previous studies. In this study, we examined the nitrogen dynamics of a highly urbanized coastal area of western Japan that is influenced by sewage-derived nitrogen loads.

Methods/Experimental

Study area

The study area is located in the northeastern part of Osaka Bay in the Seto Inland Sea in western Japan (Fig. 1). The Seto Inland Sea is the largest semi-enclosed coastal sea in Japan. The area is characterized by a temperate climate, with a mean annual precipitation of 1270 mm and a mean temperature of 15.1 °C. Osaka Bay is one of the most enclosed bays in the inland sea and has a water surface area of 1447 km2 and mean depth of 30.4 m (International EMECS Center 2008). The watershed population of the bay is approximately 16 million, including residents of the major cities of Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto, and Sakai (Nishida et al. 2012). Rapid economic growth progressed urbanization significantly in the Osaka metropolitan area from the 1950s to the 1970s. During this period, increased nutrient loads from domestic and industrial activities induced serious eutrophication and an oxygen deficit in the seawater of the bay (ANSIOB 1996; Nakatsuji 1998). Since the 1970s, the regulation of chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphorus, and nitrogen loads and the development of sewage treatment systems have decreased nutrient loads and the presence of organic matter in the Bay (International EMECS Center 2008; GESAP 2017).
Fig. 1

Map of the study area (a location of the study area, b locations of seawater sampling points on the KH, SU and SA lines and the STPs)

The target area for this study is the inner bay, near the cities of Osaka and Sakai (Fig. 1). Almost 100% of these cities are covered by sewage systems, with 12 public sewage treatment plants (STPs) in Osaka and 3 in Sakai (OPG 2016). However, the removal of nitrogen from this wastewater remains insufficient for preventing nitrogen loading, as most STPs have not yet installed advanced treatment facilities for dissolved nitrogen, such as nitrification–denitrification processes. In Osaka, the average concentration of total nitrogen (TN) and TN load of the influent to these plants are 26 mg L−1 and 44.0 t day−1, respectively, which are reduced to 11 mg L−1 and 18.6 t day−1 in the treated sewage effluent (Osaka City 2016). In Sakai, the average concentration of TN and TN load of the influent to the Sambo STP are 30 mg L−1 and 2.3 t day−1, respectively, which are reduced to 3.4 mg L−1 and 0.3 t day−1 in the treated sewage effluent (SCWSB 2015). In addition, DIN, such as nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+), is a major component of the TN in the treated sewage effluent (TSE) (Osaka City 2017). This indicates that a relatively large proportion of the DIN is discharged in the effluent of these STPs to rivers and coastal areas. Most of the sewage systems in Osaka are “combined systems,” which result in increased discharge after high rainfall events because of an inflow of storm water (Broadhead et al. 2013). Therefore, an increase in sewage-derived nitrogen loads from heavy rain has been recognized as a new problem in recent years. We focused on three STPs: Konohana (KH) and Suminoe (SU) in Osaka and Sambo (SA) in Sakai, which are all located in areas of reclaimed land near the coastal bay (STP in Fig. 1). The designed treatment populations for the STPs are 64,302 for KH, 386,431 for SU, and 175,500 for SA (OPG 2017). The treated effluents from KH and SU are discharged directly to the bay, whereas the effluent from SA is discharged to the mouth of the Yamato River.

Field campaigns and sample collection

Field campaigns were conducted in August and October 2014, February 2015, and September 2016 using a fishing boat. Three observation lines (KH line, SU line, and SA line; Fig. 1) were defined from the discharge points of the effluent from the STPs to approximately 5 km offshore. However, we could not access the discharge point of SA by boat because it is located in the Yamato River channel and the water depth is very shallow (< 2 m). There are no freshwater discharge flows of natural rivers and streams from land to the KH line except for its TSE; however, there is a small channel between the Yodo River and the line around 2.5 km from the discharge point (Fig. 1). The KH and SU lines are narrow channels, with bottom materials mainly composed of sludge with high organic matter content. The tidal range, tidal condition, air temperature, 24 h antecedent rainfall, observed lines, and average concentration of dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) in the TSE for the four sampling periods (JMA 2014–2016; Osaka City 2017) are listed in Table 1. The tidal range was larger in February 2015 and September 2016 than in August and October 2014. The air temperature was significantly lower in February 2015 than in the other periods. A 24 h antecedent rainfall was only observed in September 2016. The KH line was observed during three different periods to confirm the seasonal and temporal changes of nitrogen dynamics in the study area. The average DTN concentration in the TSE was highest for KH (14–18 mg L− 1) and lowest for SA (approximately 4 mg L− 1) (SCWSB 2015; Osaka City 2017).
Table 1

Tide and weather conditions and average DTN concentration in the TSE during the field campaigns

Year

Date

Tidal range (m)

Tidal condition

Air temperature (°C)

24 h antecedent rainfall (mm)

Observed lines

Average DTN concentration in TSE (mg L−1)

2014

31 Aug

0.8

Ebb-Rising

27–29

0

SU Line

8

2014

18 Oct

0.6

Rising

15–22

0

KH Line

14

SA Line

4a

2015

7 Feb

1.3

Ebb

5–10

0

KH Line

18

2016

18 Sep

1.4

Ebb

25–28

6.5

KH Line

14b

Rising

aAverage annual concentration

bAverage concentration in September 2014 and 2015

Vertical profiles of water temperature and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured about every 300 m along the observation lines using a conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) sensor (CTD Diver, Schlumberger) and that of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentration via a fluorescent chlorophyll and turbidity sensor (INFINITY-CLW, JFE Advantech Co., Ltd.).

Seawater samples were collected at the surface at approximately 100 m intervals and from less than 1 m above the bottom of the coastal seabed at 300 to 1000 m intervals along the observation lines. At 600 to 1000 m intervals along the observation lines, sediment samples from the surface of the seabed were collected using an Ekman grab sampler. TSE, river water, sediment pore water, and offshore seawater were collected as endmembers of coastal seawater in the study area. TSE samples were collected from land at the effluent discharge point from SA in August 2013. River water samples were collected 2 km upstream from the mouth of the Yamato River in August 2013 and September 2014. Sediment pore water was collected using piezometers installed 50 cm deep using a PVC pipe at the same location for the river water sampling in the Yamato River in August 2013. Offshore seawater samples were collected approximately 7 km from the STP on the SA line in September and October 2014. Water samples were filtered in the field using 0.2 μm cellulose ester filters for analysis of nutrients and stable isotopes and 0.7 μm glass microfiber filters for analysis of particulate organic matter (POM). The samples of water and filtrates were stored in a freezer until analysis.

Chemical and isotopic analyses

DIN as a combination of NO3−, nitrite (NO2−), and NH4+; DTN; and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) measured as phosphate (PO43−) in water samples were determined using a continuous-flow automated analyzer (SWAAT; BL TEC K. K.). Concentrations of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) were calculated from the difference between DTN and DIN. The organic nitrogen content and δ15N of POM and surface sediment samples were determined using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage and Flash EA 1112; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The δ15N in NO3− was determined using the bacterial denitrifier method (Sigman et al. 2001) with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Results and discussion

Impact zone of sewage-derived nitrogen

Figure 2 shows the spatial variations in 2014 of EC, DIN, DON, the molar ratio between DIN and DON (DIN/DON), and DIP in the surface seawater along the three observation lines (KH, SU, and SA), starting from the discharge point of the treated sewage and ending approximately 5 km offshore. The KH and SA lines were observed in October, whereas the SU line was observed in August. The tidal and weather conditions, excluding the air temperature, were similar between these two periods (Table 1). The EC was lowest (< 21 mS cm−1) and the concentration of nutrients and DON was highest (DIN > 3.0 mg L−1, DIP > 0.17 mg L−1, and DON > 0.7 mg L−1) at the STPs. DIN, mostly NO3− and NH4+, was a few times higher than DON, because DIN is a major form of nitrogen derived from TSE, as reported previously (Osaka City 2017). The DIN concentration for the SU line was higher than that for the KH line within 1–2 km of the STPs (Fig. 2b). As already mentioned, the DTN concentration in the TSE was lower for SU (8 mg L−1) than for KH (14 mg L−1) (Table 1); however, the designed treatment population for SU is six times larger than that for KH (OPG 2017). This indicates that the impact of TSE-derived nitrogen is more significant for the SU line. In addition, the higher temperature conditions in August may have accelerated the decomposition of organic matter and the nitrification process, resulting in elevated DIN concentrations. EC increased and nutrients and DON decreased significantly within 1–2 km of the STPs through mixing with seawater of the KH and SU lines. These results indicate that the impact zone of TSE-derived nitrogen is about 1–2 km offshore from the STPs. The significantly low EC (< 10 mS cm−1) and relatively high DON and DIP in this zone of the SA line may have been influenced by the Yamato River (Fig. 2a–e). The DTN and dissolved total phosphorus (DTP) concentrations in the TSE from SA were approximately 4 and 0.1 mg L−1, respectively (SCWSB 2015). This suggests that the DIP increased (> 0.2 mg L−1) as a result of phosphorus desorption via mixing of seawater (Fox et al. 1986). However, the DTN (DIN+DON) concentration in this zone was approximately 4 mg L−1, which was a similar level to that of the TSE. In addition, DIN/DON was similar among the lines. These results suggest that TSE-derived nitrogen as well as the Yamato River may have influenced the SA line.
Fig. 2

Spatial variation of a EC, b DIN, c DON, d the molar ratio between DIN and DON (DIN/DON), and e DIP in the surface seawater on the SU line in August and the KH and SA lines in October 2014

Seasonal and temporal changes in the sewage impact zone

The spatial variations of water temperature, EC, Chl-a, NO3−-N, and NH4+-N in the surface seawater of the KH line between October 2014 and February 2015 are shown in Fig. 3. Water temperature was lower in February than in October because of the difference in air temperature (Table 1). The EC was lower and the NO3−-N and NH4+-N concentrations were significantly higher in February than in October from the STP to 2 km offshore. The relatively high Chl-a concentration suggests that phytoplankton were still actively taking up nutrients in February (Fig. 3c). These results suggest that the sewage impact zone expanded in February. As noted previously, the flow of the Yodo River may affect the results for the KH line through the small channel approximately 2.5 km from the STP (Fig. 1). This indicates the effects of the TSE caused the expansion of the impact zone.
Fig. 3

Spatial variation of a water temperature, b EC, c Chl-a, d NO3−-N, and e NH4+-N in the surface seawater on the KH line in October 2014 and February 2015

A slightly higher DTN concentration in the TSE in February (18 mg L−1) than in October (14 mg L− 1) may have increased the NO3−-N and NH4+-N levels near the STP (Table 1). The tidal range was greater in February than in October, and the February observation was conducted during ebb tide (Table 1). This suggests that the plume of TSE-derived nitrogen was transported offshore with less mixing and dilution by seawater. The water temperature was nearly equal to the air temperature in October; however, it was higher than that of air temperature (> 10 °C) from the STP to approximately 2 km offshore in February (Fig. 3a, Table 1). This suggests that another possible cause for the expansion of the impact zone is the difference in water temperature between the TSE and the surface seawater. TSE is usually discharged at more than 20 °C throughout the year because of the operating parameters of the biological activated sludge treatment process (Hashimoto and Sudo 1986). This would intensify the buoyancy of the effluent plume and allow the plume to extend further offshore during periods of low seawater temperature. The effect of thermal effluent from STPs on water bodies has previously been reported for urban river systems (Nakamuro et al. 2006; Kinouchi et al. 2007).

Next, we discuss the nitrogen dynamics at approximately 2.5 km from the STP, to examine the effect of TSE-derived nitrogen. As noted above, the influence of the Yodo River inflow should be considered for more than 2.5 km offshore from the STP on the KH line. Vertical profiles of EC and Chl-a from the STP to 2.5 km offshore on the KH line during the ebb and rising tide periods in September 2016 are shown in Fig. 4. The surface EC at 2.5 km from the STP was relatively high compared to that of the other sites (Fig. 4a). This suggests that the influence of the Yodo River inflow was small within 2.5 km of the STP. The EC at depths of less than 5 m was relatively high during the ebb tide because the tidal levels in the observation period were higher during the ebb tide than during the rising tide. Both the EC and the Chl-a concentrations varied significantly between the surface and bottom for both periods. The EC was relatively low and the Chl-a concentration was high at the surface compared to those at the bottom. These results suggest that the surface seawater is significantly affected by TSE-derived nitrogen. The vertical profiles in Fig. 4 suggest that the spatial and temporal variations in DIN should be compared between these two depths.
Fig. 4

Vertical profiles of a EC and b Chl-a from the STP to 2.5 km offshore on the KH line during the ebb and rising tide periods in September 2016

Figure 5 shows the spatial variations of EC, NO3−-N, and NH4+-N at the surface and less than 1 m above the bottom of the seabed for seawater on the KH line in October 2014 and September 2016. The EC was lower at the surface than at the bottom in both periods (Fig. 5a, b). The NO3−-N concentration was relatively higher at the surface than that at the bottom; however, it was significantly lower in September than in October at the surface (Fig. 5c, d). These EC and NO3−-N results suggest that the TSE-derived nitrogen was diluted by rainwater in September because of the antecedent rainfall (Table 1). The NH4+-N concentration was at a similar level (< 0.6 mg L−1) between the two depths in October; however, it was significantly higher at the bottom than at the surface in September (Fig. 5e, f).
Fig. 5

Spatial variation of a, b EC, c, d NO3−-N, and e, f NH4+-N in the surface (a, c, e) and bottom (b, d, f) seawater of the KH line in October 2014 and September 2016

The results during the ebb and rising tides were compared in September 2016. The EC was lower during the rising tide than during the ebb tide from the STP to 1.5 km offshore at the surface (Fig. 5a) but only near the STP at the bottom (Fig. 5b). Moreover, the NO3−-N and NH4+-N concentrations were relatively high during the rising tide in the lower EC zone at the surface (Fig. 5c, e). These results suggest that the TSE-derived nitrogen was transported about 1.5 km offshore from the STP. In contrast, both the NO3−-N and NH4+-N concentrations were relatively high during the ebb tide at the bottom. The NH4+-N concentration, in particular, was detected at a level more than 10 times higher than the concentration at the surface (Fig. 5d, f). These results suggest that the sources of nitrogen were different between the surface and the bottom, especially in September.

Previous research confirmed that estuarine circulation flow is dominant in the inner part of Osaka Bay (Nakajima and Fujiwara 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2017). They imply that nitrogen at the bottom layer of the KH line originated from the bottom seawater of Osaka Bay. However, the reported NH4+-N concentrations of the bottom seawater in the bay were less than 0.3 mg L−1 (RIEAFOP 2006-2015), which is much lower than the NH4+-N concentrations detected in the bottom layer of the KH line in September (Fig. 5f). On the other hand, Onodera et al. (2013) confirmed exchange between surface water and sediment pore water caused by tidal variation in the study area. These results suggest that nitrogen supply via exchange between seawater and sediment pore water occurs in the study area.

Nitrogen dynamics in the sewage impact zone

TSE-derived nitrogen was confirmed to decrease significantly within 1–2 km of the STP (Figs. 2, 3, and 5). Figure 6 shows the relationship between the EC and DIN concentrations and between the Chl-a and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) concentrations in the surface seawater on the KH line in October 2014 and September 2016. Most of the observed DIN concentrations were lower than the concentration derived via the mixing of TSE and offshore seawater (Fig. 6a). This suggests that the dilution effect via mixing with offshore seawater is a major factor in the reduction of DIN concentrations; however, the effect of nitrogen uptake by phytoplankton should also be considered. Figure 6b indicates that the Chl-a and PON concentrations correspond relatively closely to each other and that most of the PON originates from phytoplankton. This result also suggests that the biomass of phytoplankton was about 10 times higher in September 2016 than in October 2014. The Chl-a in September 2016 was also significantly higher than in February 2015 (Fig. 3c). As noted above, the bottom materials in the observation lines are mainly composed of sludge with a high content of organic matter. These results suggest that the sediment in these observation lines originated from POM as phytoplankton.
Fig. 6

Relationship between a the EC and DIN concentrations and b the Chl-a and PON concentrations in the surface seawater of the KH line in October 2014 and September 2016

Figure 7 shows a comparison of spatial variation in PON concentrations and in δ15N values for NO3−, PON, and surface sediment of the KH line. The PON results for October 2014 and the rising tide period in September 2016 are shown (Fig. 7a, b). The δ15N values forNO3− and sediment for October 2014 are shown (Fig. 7b). As also shown in Fig. 6, the PON concentration was at a high level in September (Fig. 7a). In Fig. 7b, the average values of δ15N(NO3−) for offshore seawater, river water, pore water, and TSE were also shown as endmembers of the coastal seawater in the study area. The δ15N(NO3−) value for the KH line was + 8.8 to + 10.8‰; however, the offshore seawater, river water, and TSE showed higher values (+ 12 to + 14‰), which suggests the δ15N(NO3−) for the KH line may have been influenced by the isotope fractionation via nitrification (Kendall et al. 2007). On the other hand, the lower δ15N(NO3−) value for pore water (+ 5‰) also suggests a contribution of sediment-derived nitrogen to the NO3− in the KH line.
Fig. 7

Spatial variation in a PON concentrations and b δ15N values for NO3−, PON, and surface sediment on the KH line. The values for PON were measured in October 2014 and during the rising tide period in September 2016. The δ15N values for NO3− and sediment were measured in October 2014. The average δ15N(NO3−) for TSE, river water, offshore seawater, and pore water from 2013, 2013 and 2014, 2014, and 2013, respectively, served as reference values

Patterns of spatial variation of δ15N(PON) were similar between the two periods (Fig. 7b). It was high at the STP owing to the influence of the TSE, and then decreased before increasing again in the offshore direction, influenced by the mixing with offshore seawater and river water. δ15N was higher in NO3− than in PON, excluding at the STP in October. The result that NO3−-N was a major form of DIN at the surface (Fig. 5c) suggests that δ15N(PON) reflected δ15N(NO3−) and that δ15N(NO3−) was enriched by the nitrogen uptake of phytoplankton in October (Waser et al. 1998; Sigman et al. 1999). Waser et al. (1998) estimated through a batch culture method in a laboratory that δ15N fractionation is about 5.2‰ during uptake by a coastal diatom (Thalassiosira pseudonana). Thalassiosira spp. are major diatom species observed in the study area (Oshima et al. 2009). Sigman et al. (1999) estimated that δ15N fractionation by phytoplankton uptake is 4–6 ‰, based on field observations in the Southern Ocean. For the results of the current study, the average δ15N(NO3−) value was 9.6‰ and δ15N(PON) was 6.9‰ in October. The enrichment ratio was smaller than the isotope fractionation reported previously.

The δ15N(PON) in September was lower within 1 km of the STP and higher than in October in the offshore direction (Fig. 7b). The fact that significantly higher NH4+-N concentrations were detected in September than in October (Fig. 5e, f) suggests two possibilities: δ15N(PON) may have been influenced more by NH4+ than by NO3− and the δ15N(PON) fractionation by phytoplankton uptake of lower δ15N(NO3−) was derived through nitrification. On the other hand, the tidal range was more than two times greater in September than in October (Table 1). This suggests that a greater tidal range would have increased the exchange between seawater and pore water through the coastal sediment (intrusion and discharge) and increased the contribution of pore water with a low δ15N(NO3−) in September. δ15N was lower than PON for the surface sediment samples in the same period and had a similar value with the δ15N(NO3−) for pore water (Fig. 7b). The discharge volume of TSE would have been larger in September because of the antecedent rainfall (Table 1). This condition may have intensified the estuarine circulation flow, and exchange between seawater and pore water may have increased in September. It also would have been supported by the high concentration of NH4+-N observed in both the bottom and surface seawater samples in September (Fig. 5e, f). The increase in nitrogen supply through sediment during this period would have caused an increase in phytoplankton and PON. However, we require data on δ15N(NH4−) to understand these processes in greater detail. Also, seasonal variation in nitrogen concentration and δ15N(NO3−) for the endmembers, such as the Yodo River water, will need to be confirmed because previous research pointed out that δ15N(NO3−) for river water may change according to river discharge (Takagi et al. 2016).

Based on these results, a schematic diagram of nitrogen dynamics in the coastal area, as influenced by sewage-derived loads, is shown in Fig. 8. The sewage-derived nitrogen impact zone (SNIZ) via direct discharge of TSE was estimated to be 1–2 km from the STPs on the KH and SU lines. This result also suggests that the spatial variation in SNIZ is controlled by tidal variation and the water temperature difference between the TSE and seawater. On the other hand, the SA line was confirmed to be significantly influenced by the Yamato River as well as the TSE. However, similar values of δ15N(NO3−) for the TSE and Yamato River water suggest the Yamato River is influenced by the STPs located upstream. Conclusively, this study indicates that coastal sediment is another potential source of nitrogen and is transported via exchange between seawater and pore water. More specifically, the sediment may have originated from POM as phytoplankton, which is a secondary product of TSE-derived nitrogen. This suggests that the TSE-derived nitrogen in the coastal environment is not only from direct discharge but also from resupply through the sediment.
Fig. 8

Schematic diagram of nitrogen dynamics in the coastal sewage-derived nitrogen impact zone (SNIZ). Solid and broken arrows show water movement and suggested processes from the present research, respectively

However, as the study area is influenced by tidal variation and mixing of several endmembers, the nitrogen dynamics should be quite complex compared with closed systems and the open ocean. Our results indicate that temporal changes in mixing ratios of endmembers and nitrogen uptake by phytoplankton influence both the nitrogen concentration and δ15N in this study area, although further research is needed for quantitative evaluation of nitrogen transport processes.

Conclusions

In this study, nitrogen dynamics were examined for a sewage-influenced coastal area in western Japan. The impact zone of sewage-derived nitrogen by direct discharge of TSE was estimated to be 1–2 km from STPs in the study area. DIN uptake by phytoplankton as well as dilution by offshore seawater contributed to the decrease in sewage-derived nitrogen. However, the extent of the impact zone was shown to be controlled by tidal variation temporally and water temperature differences between TSE and seawater seasonally. These results also indicate that nitrogen supply via exchange between seawater and sediment pore water is another important source of nitrogen beyond the direct discharge of TSE.

Abbreviations

SNIZ: 

Sewage-derived nitrogen impact zone

STPs: 

Sewage treatment plants

TSE: 

Treated sewage effluent

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Yutaka Maruyama and Mr. Yusuke Tomozawa for their assistance in our field campaigns and analysis of the samples. MS gratefully acknowledges Dr. Seiko Yoshikawa and Dr. Masahiro Kobayashi, who were session conveners of A-HW16 in Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2016, for their recommendation of the present study to PEPS. Finally, the authors would like to thank the two reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant for Environmental Rehabilitation and Creation of the Osaka Bay Area (Head; SO, 2014–2016, Grant Number 280007) and JSPS bilateral joint research projects (Head; SO, 2016–2018).

MS was partly funded by the tenure track program of JST for Okayama University (2013–2014).

Authors’ contributions

MS proposed the topic and conceived and designed the study. SO collaborated with the corresponding author in the construction of the manuscript. GJ, YS, and MT analyzed the data and helped in their interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
(2)
Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
(3)
Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China
(4)
Western Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fukuyama, Japan
(5)
Faculty of Systems Engineering, Wakayama University, Wakayama, Japan

References

  1. ANSIOB (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay) (1996) Communication tool for sustainable development. Institute of Coastal Environment Inc. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Broadhead AT, Horn R, Lerner DN (2013) Captured streams and springs in combined sewers: a review of the evidence, consequences and opportunities. Water Res 47:4752–4766View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Costanzo SD, O’donohue MJ, Dennison WC, Loneragan NR, Thomas M (2001) A new approach for detecting and mapping sewage impacts. Mar Pollut Bull 42:149–156Google Scholar
  4. Drury B, Rosi-Marshall E, Kelly JJ (2013) Wastewater treatment effluent reduces the abundance and diversity of benthic bacterial communities in urban and suburban rivers. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:1897–1905View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Eyre BD (2000) Regional evaluation of nutrient transformation and phytoplankton growth in nine river-dominated sub-tropical east Australian estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 205:61–83View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox LE, Sager SL, Wofsy SC (1986) The chemical control of soluble phosphorus in the Amazon estuary. Geochim Cosmochim AC 50:783–794View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Garside C, Malone TC, Roels OA, Sharfstein BA (1976) An evaluation of sewage-derived nutrients and their influence on the Hudson Estuary and New York Bight. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 4:281–289View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. GESAP (GEC Sanitation Programme) (2017) Sewage works in Osaka, Japan. http://nett21.gec.jp/GESAP/themes/index.html. Accessed 27 May 2017Google Scholar
  9. Gruber N, Galloway JN (2008) An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451:293–296View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hashimoto S, Sudo R (1986) New method of activated sludge. The Industrial Water Institute, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Howarth RW, Marino R (2006) Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:364–376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. International EMECS (Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas) Center (2008) Environmental conservation of the Seto Inland Sea. https://www.emecs.or.jp/upload/publish/seto_inland_sea_en.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2017Google Scholar
  13. JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency) (2014–2016) Past metrological data and tidal observation data. http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/menureport.html. Accessed 14 June 2017
  14. Kendall C, Elliott MM, Wankel SD (2007) Tracing anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen to ecosystems. In: Michener R, Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinouchi T, Yagi H, Miyamoto M (2007) Increase in stream temperature related to anthropogenic heat input from urban wastewater. J Hydrol 335:78–88View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kobayashi S, Matsumura Y, Kawamura K, Nakajima M, Yamamoto K, Akiyama S, Ueta Y (2017) Estimation of the origin of dissolved organic matter and biogeochemical cycles of nutrients in Osaka Bay, Japan. J Jpn Soc Water Environ 40:97–105 (in Japanese)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakajima M, Fujiwara T (2007) Estuarine circulation and hypoxic water mass in Osaka Bay. Bull Coast Oceanogr 44:157–163 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Nakamuro K, Okuno T, Takata S, Taguchi H, Inoue T, Ueda A, Fukunaga I, Kagajyo N, Hattori Y, Koi H (2006) Influence of sewage effluent on temperature of urban river water. J Jpn Soc Water Environ 29:177–181 (in Japanese)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakatsuji K (1998) Water environment in coastal area. In: Takahashi Y, Kawada K (eds) Water cycle and catchment environment. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Nishida S, Kawasumi R, Nakatani Y, Murakami Y (2012) Changes and current state of nutrient loads in the Osaka Bay basin. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser G (Environmental Research) 68:III751–III760 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. Nixon SW (1995) Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41:199–219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Onodera S (2011) Subsurface pollution in Asian megacities. In: Taniguchi M (ed) Groundwater and subsurface environments: human impacts in Asian coastal cities. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  23. Onodera S, Saito M, Yoshikawa M, Onishi K, Shimizu Y, Ito H (2013) Nutrient transport and surface water-groundwater interactions in the tidal zone of the Yamato River, Japan. IAHS Publ 361:204–211Google Scholar
  24. OPG (Osaka Prefectural Government) (2016) Municipal coverage of sewage treatment system in 2016 (in Japanese). http://www.pref.osaka.lg.jp/gesui_jigyo/tokei/fukyuh20.html. Accessed 27 May 2017
  25. OPG (Osaka Prefectural Government) (2017) Statistics of sewage treatment system in Osaka prefecture (in Japanese). http://www.pref.osaka.lg.jp/gesui_jigyo/tokei/index.html. Accessed 23 Oct 2017Google Scholar
  26. Osaka City (2016) Osaka city environmental white paper (in Japanese). http://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/kankyo/page/0000370176.html. Accessed 27 May 2017
  27. Osaka City (2017) Results of water quality test of sewage treatment plants (in Japanese). http://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/kensetsu/page/0000009603.html. Accessed 23 June 2017
  28. Oshima A, Nishio T, Fujiwara Y, Shinya M, Kitano M (2009) Dynamics of a red tide of Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira spp. (Bacillariophyceae) around the Yume-Shima landfill site in Osaka Bay. Annu Rep Osaka City Inst Public Health Environ Sci 71:49–55Google Scholar
  29. Pennino MJ, Kaushal SS, Murthy SN, Blomquist JD, Cornwell JC, Harris LA (2016) Sources and transformations of anthropogenic nitrogen along an urban river–estuarine continuum. Biogeosciences 13:6211–6228View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Powley HR, Dürr HH, Lima AT, Krom MD, Van Cappellen P (2016) Direct discharges of domestic wastewater are a major source of phosphorus and nitrogen to the Mediterranean Sea. Environ Sci Technol 50:8722–8730View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. RIEAFOP (Research Institute of Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, Osaka Prefecture) (2006-2015) Annual project reports (in Japanese). http://www.kannousuiken-osaka.or.jp/publication/suisan_shiryo/. Accessed 27 Oct 2017
  32. Savage C (2005) Tracing the influence of sewage nitrogen in a coastal ecosystem using stable nitrogen isotopes. Ambio 34:145–150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. SCWSB (Sakai City Waterworks and Sewerage Bureau) (2015) Annual report of sewerage quality in 2015 (in Japanese). http://water.city.sakai.lg.jp/customer/suisitujhoho/gesuidou/1444721746786.html. Accessed 23 Oct 2017Google Scholar
  34. Sigman DM, Altabet MA, McCorkle DC, Francois R, Fischer G (1999) The δ15N of nitrate in the Southern Ocean: consumption of nitrate in surface waters. Glob Biogeochem CY 13:1149–1166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Sigman DM, Casciotti KL, Andreani M, Barford C, Galanter M, Böhlke JK (2001) A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater. Anal Chem 73:4145–4153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Takagi S, Kondo M, Kobayashi S, Abo K (2016) Influence on the changes of nutrient conditions and nitrogen stable isotope to the evaluation in nutrient load from land to the sea. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng, Ser B2 (Coastal Engineering) 72:I_1255–I_1260 (in Japanese)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar
  38. Waiser MJ, Tumber V, Holm J (2011) Effluent-dominated streams. Part 1: presence and effects of excess nitrogen and phosphorus in Wascana Creek, Saskatchewan, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:496–507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Waser NAD, Harrison PJ, Nielsen B, Calvert SE (1998) Nitrogen isotope fractionation during the uptake and assimilation of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, and urea by a marine diatom. Limnol Oceanogr 43:215–224View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement