Skip to main content

Preface for the article collection “Stratigraphy and paleoclimatic/paleoenvironmental evolution across the Early–Middle Pleistocene transition in the Chiba composite section, Japan, and other reference sections in East Asia”

The Earth experienced dramatic and progressive changes in oceanic and atmospheric circulation, ice sheet distributions, and biotic evolution from the Early to Middle Pleistocene. This interval is now known as the “Early–Middle Pleistocene transition (EMPT)” (Head and Gibbard 2015; Head 2019). Because East Asia is an important region for land–ocean–atmosphere heat and moisture exchange owing to its location at the boundary between Eurasia and the Pacific Ocean (e.g., Tada and Murray, 2016) (Fig. 1), understanding paleoenvironmental change in this region will provide valuable insights into Earth’s climate system. Continuous deep-ocean records across this climatic transition are not rare, but constructing detailed links between atmospheric circulation, terrestrial environmental change, and evolution of the biota have been hampered by an inevitable scarcity of continuous and expanded sedimentary records from coastal, shallow-marine environments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the climatic configurations in East Asia, and the Mediterranean and North Atlantic Ocean. Locations of the Chiba composite section and other important sites discussed in this special issue are shown. Atmospheric systems are abbreviated as follows. SH Siberian High, AL Aleutian Low, ITCZ intertropical convergence zone, AH Azores High

The Chiba composite section, including the Chiba section itself which was recently ratified as the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) defining the base of the Middle Pleistocene Subseries/Subepoch and Chibanian Stage/Age (Head 2021; Head et al. 2021; Suganuma et al. 2021), is a continuous marine silty sedimentary record from upper Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 20 to lower MIS 18, representing one of the most expanded and chronostratigraphically constrained sections yet documented across the Lower–Middle Pleistocene boundary (e.g., Kazaoka et al. 2015; Suganuma et al. 2018). This composite section comprises five individual exposures cropping out along a 7.4 km transect, all securely linked by a detailed framework of tephra beds. Deposited on the continental slope and receiving substantial organic input from both marine and terrestrial sources (Balota et al. 2021; Izumi et al. 2021; Suganuma et al. 2018), it therefore provides a rare opportunity to capture both terrestrial and marine environmental variability continuously across MIS 19 and hence the Lower–Middle Pleistocene boundary.

This special issue focuses on sedimentary records from the Chiba composite section and its stratigraphic correlation with other reference sections in East Asia and across the globe. It addresses terrestrial and marine paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental co-evolution with an emphasis on the midlatitude westerly jet stream, East Asian monsoon, North Pacific Gyre, and the interplay of subtropical and subpolar settings across MIS 19 and through the Early–Middle Pleistocene transition. We hope the articles collected in this issue within the Special Call for Excellent Papers on Hot Topics (SPEPS) series will stimulate and promote future research on stratigraphy and paleoenvironmental changes in this region. Detailed comparisons between reference sections in East Asia and the global record will help further our understanding of Earth’s climate system.

The Chiba composite section, located near the Pacific margin of the central Japanese archipelago (Fig. 1), belongs to the Kokumoto Formation of the Kazusa Group, which is one of the thickest (~ 3000 m) and best exposed Lower and Middle Pleistocene marine sedimentary successions in the world (e.g., Kazaoka et al. 2015; Takao et al. 2020). It represents the infill of the Kazusa fore-arc basin, developed in response to the west–north–westward subduction of the Pacific plate beneath the Philippine Sea plate along the Japan and Izu–Bonin trenches (e.g., Seno and Takano 1989).

The stratigraphy of the Kazusa Group has been evaluated since the 1940s (e.g., Kanehara et al. 1949; Shinada et al. 1951; Mitsunashi et al. 1961), with more recent focus shifting to the depositional systems and glacioeustatic sea level changes (e.g., Ito and Katsura 1992; Pickering et al. 1999; Takao et al. 2020). In this issue, Takao et al. (2020) report a detailed investigation into the depositional processes responsible for deepwater massive sandstones (DWMSs) occurring in the middle to upper parts of the Kazusa Group. The authors suggest that these DWMSs represent density flows developed in response to prograding shelf-margin deltas or fan deltas during the falling and lowstand stages of relative sea level. These sandstones contrast with the muddy deposits of the Chiba composite section which are interpreted to have formed in the uppermost part of a transgressive systems tract (Takao et al. 2020), explaining their suitability for high-resolution paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic studies.

The Matuyama–Brunhes (M–B) paleomagnetic boundary represents a clear and global isochronous marker and hence serves as the primary guide to the Lower–Middle Pleistocene boundary (Head et al. 2008; Suganuma et al. 2021). A tightly defined M–B paleomagnetic polarity boundary has been observed throughout the Chiba composite section and adjacent areas (Suganuma et al. 2015, 2018; Hyodo et al. 2016; Okada et al. 2017; Haneda et al. 2020a), providing a precise tie point for global stratigraphic correlation. Haneda et al. (2020a) report in this issue a detailed record of the geomagnetic field reversal behavior over time. A clear drop observed in paleointensity is supported by the authigenic 10Be/9Be record (Simon et al. 2019). An astronomically estimated M–B boundary age of 772.9 ± 5.4 ka at the Chiba composite section (Haneda et al. 2020a) is consistent with that of paleomagnetic records (e.g., Channell et al. 2010, 2020; Channell 2017; Valet et al. 2019) and cosmogenic nuclide records (Raisbeck et al. 2006; Suganuma et al. 2010; Simon et al. 2018; Valet et al. 2019), around the world. This age is also consistent with a weighted mean 40Ar/39Ar age of 773 ± 2 ka from new measurements and the recalibration of all M–B transitionally magnetized lava flow sequences (Singer et al. 2019), which facilitates a robust chronostratigraphic framework for the Chiba composite section.

In this special issue, Hyodo et al. (2020) report a detailed paleomagnetic record across the M–B boundary from a loess succession in Lingtai, central Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP). Loess-paleosol sequences can be excellent archives of past changes in the geomagnetic field not only for polarity but also direction and intensity, although the process leading to magnetization lock-in remains unclear. Hyodo et al. (2020) have investigated more than 100 high-resolution paleomagnetic samples from the succession and found millennial-to-sub-centennial-scale polarity flips around the M–B paleomagnetic boundary. Although further investigations from adjacent sections in the CLP, along with other expanded sedimentary sections and lava sequences, are needed to confirm the nature of these high-speed polarity flips, their documentation should yield new insights into the physical processes leading to this geomagnetic reversal and improve global correlation and age constraints for terrestrial sections.

Other polarity boundaries recorded in and around the Japanese archipelago are similarly useful for understanding the dynamics of geomagnetic field reversals and in refining their chronological framework. Konishi and Okada (2020), in this issue, reconstruct a high-resolution paleomagnetic record of the lower part of the Matuyama Chronozone from the Chikura Group in the southern part of the Boso Peninsula (Naruse et al. 1951; Kotake 1988) which contains the Réunion Subchronozone and the lower Olduvai polarity reversal. Although these sections have not been chronologically well constrained, they are thought to be the most expanded records so far obtained. Thus, the timings and durations of geomagnetic field variations obtained from the Chikura Group will help understand the general phenomenon of geomagnetic field reversals. Meanwhile, Xuan et al. (2020) present a Pliocene–Pleistocene magnetostratigraphy of deep-sea sediments at Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 346 Site U1424 in the Yamato Basin, Japan Sea, based on the transitions of polarity chrons and subchrons coupled with a detailed tephrostratigraphy. The integrated stratigraphy proposed for Site U1424 offers an excellent chronological framework for both marine and terrestrial Pliocene–Pleistocene sections in the region.

The Chiba composite section has yielded a diverse array of well-preserved marine and terrestrial microfossils and provides an ultra-high-resolution benthic and planktonic foraminiferal isotope record that captures centennial- to millennial-scale paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic changes from late MIS 20 to early MIS 18 (Suganuma et al. 2021). In this issue, Kameo et al. (2020), Balota et al. (2021), and Itaki et al. (2022) document the assemblage changes of calcareous nannofossils, dinoflagellate cysts, and radiolarians, respectively, to explore variations in the position of the Subarctic Front between the subtropical Kuroshio and subarctic Oyashio currents. Because the Subarctic Front is presently situated just east of the Boso Peninsula (Qiu 2001), the Chiba composite section is located at an ideal position to record the past displacement of the front. Changes in marine microfossil assemblages and indicator taxa along with foraminiferal isotope data reveal millennial-scale fluctuations superimposed on glacial–interglacial orbital-scale variability, in which the phenomenon is generally coherent with detailed records from the North Atlantic and Mediterranean region (Haneda et al. 2020b; Head 2021). Based on the abundant occurrences of a warm-water calcareous nannofossil and radiolarian species, Kameo et al. (2020) and Itaki et al. (2022) respectively show periodic intensifications of the Kuroshio Current following the end of MIS 19c and continuing into MIS 18, indicating repeated northward shifts of the Subarctic Front. In addition, the dinoflagellate cyst record reveals instability in the Kuroshio Extension system throughout MIS 19c and the abrupt influence of the Kuroshio–Oyashio Interfrontal Zone in MIS 19b, signaling the first stadial of the latter part of MIS 19 (Balota et al. 2021). This instability and similar rapid shifts are also seen in the cyclic appearance of cold-water calcareous nannofossil and radiolarian taxa from MIS 19b to MIS 18 (Kameo et al. 2020; Itaki et al. 2022).

The total organic carbon (TOC) values of the Chiba composite section also show millennial-scale oscillations in the latter part of MIS 19a (Izumi et al. 2021). Although the δ13Corg and C/N records are generally modulated by glacial–interglacial orbital-scale variability, Izumi et al. (2021) show that peaks of TOC at warmer intervals in MIS 19a represent enhanced organic matter preservation owing to water column stratification caused by the northward displacement of the Subarctic Front rather than increased surface water productivity. However, the radiolarian records infer that the warmer intervals are characterized by higher productivity, which may reasonably be explained by a stratified Kuroshio–Oyashio structure (Itaki et al. 2022). The dinoflagellate cyst record, which might represent warm-season conditions rather than the cold-season signal reflected by most of the other proxies, includes increased cyst concentrations during the initial stadial following MIS 19c. This implies increased surface water productivity resulting from a southward shift of the Subarctic Front and increased influence of the nutrient-rich waters of the Oyashio Current (Balota et al. 2021).

Also in this issue, Kubota et al. (2021) examine calcareous nannofossil and radiolarian assemblage records and geochemical data from planktonic foraminifera (δ18O, δ13C, and Mg/Ca) of the Chiba composite section and offer new paleoceanographic insights based on their quantitative analysis. Through the use of principal component analysis (PCA) to capture dominant patterns of temporal variation in these records, the authors confirm that the microfossil assemblages are consistent with the water mass types inferred from the geochemical proxies. They also show that oceanic conditions, including latitudinal shifts of the Subarctic Front, were closely linked both to the East Asian Winter Monsoon and the orbitally modulated global climatic signal, as previously suggested by Suganuma et al. (2018). This approach identifies independent signals in geological records, such as those generated by surface and subsurface ocean processes, and therefore has great potential to advance our understanding of the ocean circulation and East Asian climate.

MIS 19c is of special relevance to our present interglacial (Holocene) owing to similar orbital configurations. Both interglacials are characterized by low orbital eccentricity, and their precession and obliquity parameters are nearly in phase allowing their inception to be unambiguously aligned. For this reason, MIS 19c has been used as a baseline to understand the trajectory of our future interglacial under natural conditions (e.g., Tzedakis et al. 2012; Suganuma et al. 2018; Head 2021). Detailed paleoclimatic records of MIS 19 are therefore particularly significant. With this in mind, Head (2021) in this issue reviews the climatic characteristics of MIS 19 on a global scale, incorporating records from East Asia with other key sites from the Mediterranean and North Atlantic Ocean. A critical feature of MIS 19 is its pronounced millennial-scale climate variability following the inception of glaciation that terminates MIS 19c. Head (2021) covers key topics including the interrupted deglaciation of Termination IX, the length and amplitude of full interglacial condition within MIS 19c, the stadial–interstadial oscillations during MIS 19b–c, and the teleconnections responsible for the remarkable coherence observed in MIS 19 records globally. The bipolar seesaw mechanism via Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) across the Atlantic certainly played a major role in climatic oscillations, causing shifts in the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ). These oscillations were especially pronounced during MIS 19b–a, with low-latitude monsoon dynamics likely having amplified responses regionally (Nomade et al. 2019; Haneda et al. 2020b). Similarities between high-latitude Asian and northern North Atlantic records suggest the concurrent influence of high-latitude teleconnections (Head 2021). Therefore, the importance of additional high-resolution studies from East Asia and northern Asia as well as from the southern hemisphere is needed to fully understand the nature of these phenomena during MIS 19. In addition, a detailed history of the Middle Pleistocene, from its first use as a term to its final ratification along with the Chibanian Stage, is reviewed by Head (2021).

This special issue encompasses a broad range of methodologies and demonstrates the importance of paleoclimatic interpretation in Quaternary stratigraphy to understand global linkages in the climate system. It also highlights the value of paleomagnetic reversals for defining formal chronostratigraphic units. In focusing on MIS 19, with a duration of only around 30 kyr, the special issue exemplifies the value of ultra-high-resolution stratigraphic analysis for understanding climatic evolution on a global scale during an orbital configuration similar to the present and at a timescale relevant to the future of our planet.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the authors contributing to this special issue for data requests.

Abbreviations

M–B boundary:

Matuyama–Brunhes boundary

MIS:

Marine isotope stage

GSSP:

Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point

CLP:

Chinese Loess Plateau

AMOC:

Atlantic meridional overturning circulation

ITCZ:

Intertropical convergence zone

References

  • Balota EJ, Head MJ, Okada M, Suganuma Y, Haneda Y (2021) Paleoceanography and dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy across the Lower-Middle Pleistocene Subseries (Calabrian–Chibanian Stage) boundary at the Chiba composite section, Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 8:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00438-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channell JET (2017) Complexity in Matuyama-Brunhes polarity transitions from North Atlantic IODP/ODP deep-sea sites. Earth Planet Sci Let 467:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channell JET, Hodell DA, Singer BS, Xuan C (2010) Reconciling astrochronological and 40Ar/39Ar ages for the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary and late Matuyama chron. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11:Q0AA12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC00320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channell JET, Singer BS, Jicha BR (2020) Timing of Quaternary geomagnetic reversals and excursions in volcanic and sedimentary archives. Quat Sci Rev 228:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haneda Y, Okada M, Suganuma Y, Kitamura T (2020a) A full sequence of the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the Chiba composite section, Central Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00354-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haneda Y, Okada M, Kubota Y, Suganuma Y (2020b) Millennial-scale hydrographic changes in the northwestern Pacific during marine isotope stage 19: teleconnection with ice melt in the North Atlantic. Earth Planet Sci Let 531:115936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head MJ (2019) Formal subdivision of the Quaternary System/Period: present status and future directions. Quat Int 500:32–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head MJ (2021) Review of the Early-Middle Pleistocene boundary and Marine Isotope Stage 19. Prog Earth Planet Sci 8:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00439-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head MJ, Gibbard PL (2015) Early-Middle Pleistocene transitions: linking terrestrial and marine realms. Quat Int 389:7–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head MJ, Pillans B, Farquhar S (2008) The Early-Middle Pleistocene Transition: characterization and proposed guide for the defining boundary. Episodes 31(2):255–259. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2008/v31i2/014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head MJ, Pillans B, Zalasiewicz JA (2021) Formal ratification of subseries/subepochs for the Pleistocene Series/Epoch of the Quaternary System/Period. Episodes 44(3):241–247. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Katoh S, Kitamura A, Takasaki K, Matsushita H, Kitaba I, Tanaka I, Nara M, Matsuzaki T, Dettman DL, Okada M (2016) High resolution stratigraphy across the early–middle Pleistocene boundary from a core of the Kokumoto Formation at Tabuchi, Chiba Prefecture, Japan. Quat Int 397:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Banjo K, Yang T, Katoh S, Shi M, Yasuda Y, Fukuda J, Miki M, Bradák B (2020) A centennial-resolution terrestrial climatostratigraphy and Matuyama-Brunhes transition record from a loess sequence in China. Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00337-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itaki T, Utsuki S, Haneda Y, Kubota Y, Suganuma Y, Okada M (2022) Millennial-scale oscillations in the Kuroshio-Oyashio boundary during MIS 19 based on the radiolarian record from the Chiba composite section, central Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 9:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00465-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito M, Katsura Y (1992) Inferred glacio-eustatic control for high-frequency depositional sequences of the Plio-Pleistocene Kazusa Group, a forearc basin fill in Boso Peninsula, Japan. Sed Geol 80:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumi K, Haneda Y, Suganuma Y, Okada M, Kubota Y, Nishida N, Kawamata M, Matsuzaki T (2021) Multiproxy sedimentological and geochemical analyses across the Lower-Middle Pleistocene boundary: chemostratigraphy and paleoenvironment of the Chiba composite section, central Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 8:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00393-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameo K, Kubota Y, Haneda Y, Suganuma Y, Okada M (2020) Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Lower-Middle Pleistocene boundary of the GSSP, Chiba composite section in the Kokumoto Formation, Kazusa Group, central Japan, and implications for sea-surface environmental changes. Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00355-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanehara K, Oyama K, Ono A, Ida K, Motojima K, Ishiwada Y, Shinada Y, Akino T, Mitsunashi T, Yasukuni N (1949) Natural gas in the vicinity of Mobara, Chiba-ken. J Jpn Assoc Pet Technol 14:245–274 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazaoka O, Suganuma Y, Okada M, Kameo K, Head MJ, Yoshida T, Kameyama S, Nirei H, Aida N, Kumai H (2015) Stratigraphy of the Kazusa Group, Central Japan: a high-resolution marine sedimentary sequence from the Lower to Middle Pleistocene. Quat Int 383:116–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi T, Okada M (2020) A paleomagnetic record of the early Matuyama chron including the Réunion subchron and the onset Olduvai boundary: High-resolution magnetostratigraphy and insights from transitional geomagnetic fields. Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00352-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotake N (1988) Upper Cenozoic marine sediments in southern part of the Boso Peninsula, central Japan. J Geol Soc Jpn 94:187–206. https://doi.org/10.5575/geosoc.94.187(inJapanesewithEnglishabstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota Y, Haneda Y, Kameo K, Itaki T, Hayashi H, Shikoku K, Izumi K, Head MJ, Suganuma Y, Okada M (2021) Paleoceanography of the northwestern Pacific across the Early-Middle Pleistocene boundary (Marine Isotope Stages 20–18). Prog Earth Planet Sci 8:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00395-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunashi T, Yazaki K, Kageyama K, Shimada T, Ono E, Yasukuni N, Makino T, Shinada Y, Fujiwara K, Kamata S (1961) Geological maps of the oil and gas field of Japan no. 4, Futtsu-Otaki, 1:50,000. Geological Survey of Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Naruse Y, Sugimura A, Koike K (1951) Geology of Tertiary in southernmost part of the Boso Peninsula. Jpn J Geol Soc Jpn 57:511–526. https://doi.org/10.5575/geosoc.57.511 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomade S, Bassinot F, Marino M, Simon Q, Dewilde F, Maiorano P, Isguder G, Blamart D, Girone A, Scao V, Pereira A, Toti F, Bertini A, Combourieu-Nebout N, Peral M, Bourles DL, Petrosino P, Gallicchio S, Ciaranfi N (2019) High- resolution foraminifer stable isotope record of MIS 19 at Montalbano Jonico, southern Italy: a window into Mediterranean climatic variability during a low-eccentricity interglacial. Quat Sci Rev 205:106–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada M, Suganuma Y, Haneda Y, Kazaoka O (2017) Paleomagnetic direction and paleointensity variations during the Matuyama-Brunhes polarity transition from a marine succession in the Chiba composite section of the Boso Peninsula, central Japan. Earth Planets Space 69:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0627-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering KT, Souter C, Oba T, Taira A, Schaaf M, Platzman E (1999) Glacio-eustatic control on deep-marine clastic forearc sedimentation, Pliocene–mid-Pleistocene (c. 1180–600 ka) Kazusa Group, SE Japan. J Geol Soc Lond 156:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu B (2001) Kuroshio and Oyashio currents. In: Steele JH, Thorpe SA, Turekian KK (eds) Encyclopedia of oceansciences. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisbeck GM, Yiou F, Cattani O, Jouzel J (2006) 10Be evidence for the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the EPICA Dome C ice core. Nature 443:82–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seno T, Takano T (1989) Seismotectonics at the trench-trench-trench triple junction off central Honshu. Pure Appl Geophys 129:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinada Y, Maki S, Takada Y, Omori E (1951) Investigation of iodic brine waters in the vicinity of Kuniyoshi-machi, Chiba Pref. J Jpn Assoc Pet Technol 16:312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon Q, Thouveny N, Bourlès DL, Bassinot F, Savranskaia T, Valet J-P (2018) Increased production of cosmogenic 10Be recorded in oceanic sediment sequences: Information on the age, duration, and amplitude of the geomagnetic dipole moment minimum over the Matuyama-Brunhes transition. Earth Planet Sci Lett 489:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon Q, Suganuma Y, Okada M, Haneda Y, ASTER team (2019) High-resolution 10Be and paleomagnetic recording of the last polarity reversal in the Chiba composite section: age and dynamics of the Matuyama-Brunhes transition. Earth Planet Sci Lett 519:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer BS, Jicha BR, Mochizuki N, Coe RS (2019) Synchronizing volcanic, sedimentary, and ice core records of Earth’s last magnetic polarity reversal. Sci Adv 5:aaw4621. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw4621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suganuma Y, Yokoyama Y, Yamazaki T, Kawamura K, Horng CS, Matsuzaki H (2010) Be-10 evidence for delayed acquisition of remanent magnetization in marine sediments: Implication for a new age for the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary. Earth Planet Sci Lett 296:443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suganuma Y, Okada M, Horie K, Kaiden H, Takehara M, Senda R, Kimura J, Kawamura K, Haneda Y, Kazaoka O, Head MJ (2015) Age of Matuyama-Brunhes boundary constrained by U-Pb zircon dating of a widespread tephra. Geology 43:491–494. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36625.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suganuma Y, Haneda Y, Kameo K, Kubota Y, Hayashi H, Itaki T, Okuda M, Head MJ, Sugaya M, Nakazato H, Igarashi A, Shikoku K, Hongo M, Watanabe M, Satoguchi Y, Takeshita Y, Nishida N, Izumi K, Kawamura K, Kawamata M, Okuno J, Yoshida T, Ogitsu I, Yabusaki H, Okada M (2018) Paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic records of Marine Isotope Stage 19 at the Chiba composite section, central Japan: a reference for the Early-Middle Pleistocene boundary. Quat Sci Rev 191:406–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suganuma Y, Okada M, Head MJ, Kameo K, Haneda Y, Hayashi H, Irizuki T, Itaki T, Izumi K, Kubota Y, Nakazato H, Nishida N, Okuda M, Satoguchi Y, Simon Q, Takeshita Y (2021) Formal ratification of the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Chibanian Stage and Middle Pleistocene Subseries of the Quaternary System: the Chiba Section, Japan. Episodes 44(3):317–347. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tada R, Murray RW (2016) Preface for the article collection “Land–Ocean Linkages under the Influence of the Asian Monsoon.” Prog Earth Planet Sci 3:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-016-0100-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takao A, Nakamura K, Takaoka S, Fuse M, Oda Y, Shimano Y, Nishida N, Ito M (2020) Spatial and temporal variations in depositional systems in the Kazusa Group: insights into the origins of deep-water massive sandstones in a Pleistocene forearc basin on the Boso Peninsula, Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00343-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzedakis PC, Channell JET, Hodell DA, Kleiven HF, Skinner LC (2012) Determining the natural length of the current interglacial. Nat Geosci 5:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valet JP, Bassinot F, Simon Q, Savranskaia T, Thouveny N, Bourlés DL, Villedieu A (2019) Constraining the age of the last geomagnetic reversal from geochemical and magnetic analyses of Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sediments. Earth Planet Sci Let 506:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuan C, Jin Y, Sugisaki S, Satoguchi Y, Nagahashi Y (2020) Integrated Pliocene-Pleistocene magnetostratigraphy and tephrostratigraphy of deep-sea sediments at IODP Site U1424 (Yamato Basin, Japan Sea). Prog Earth Planet Sci 7:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00373-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Chiba composite section research community. We are also grateful to the PEPS staff for their support and patience during the submission and revision of manuscripts and the PEPS editorial board for its helpful and swift editorial handling of these contributions. This article has been improved by helpful comments from Ryuji Tada. We are grateful to Jun’ichi Okuno for drafting Fig. 1.

Authors’ information

YS is an associate professor at the National Institute of Polar Research (NIPR) and at the Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Japan. He is an Advisory Board member of the INQUA Commission on Stratigraphy and Chronology (INQUA- SACCOM) (2015–). He was also a member of International Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy Working Group on the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Subseries Boundary (2017–2020). MJH is a professor of Earth Sciences at Brock University, Canada. He was Chair of the International Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy and Co-Convener of its Working Group on the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Boundary during the time the Chiba section was proposed and ultimately ratified as the GSSP for the Chibanian Stage and Middle Pleistocene Subseries. TS is an assistant professor at Kanazawa University, Japan. He is a committee member of Past Global Changes (PAGES)-JAPAN and Paleosciences Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS wrote the draft of the manuscript, and MJH and TS rewrote and confirmed the contents. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Suganuma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suganuma, Y., Head, M.J. & Sagawa, T. Preface for the article collection “Stratigraphy and paleoclimatic/paleoenvironmental evolution across the Early–Middle Pleistocene transition in the Chiba composite section, Japan, and other reference sections in East Asia”. Prog Earth Planet Sci 9, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00468-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00468-5

Keywords

  • Early–Middle Pleistocene transition
  • Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 19
  • Matuyama–Brunhes reversal
  • Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP)
  • Chiba composite section