Skip to main content

Table 5 Results obtained by the application of multimodal functions

From: Development of particle swarm clustered optimization method for applications in applied sciences

Dimension

Result type

Result type

Algorithm

PSCO

PSO

AGPSO

DMOA

INFO

30

F4

Best

1.5 × 10–32

1.5 × 10–32

1.5 × 10–32

2.34 × 10–1

8.95 × 10–2

Worst

6.39 × 10–30

1.82

1.5 × 10–32

6.97 × 10–1

8.06 × 10–1

Average

1.17 × 10–30

6.90 × 10–1

2.16 × 10–32

5.55 × 10–1

3.88 × 10–1

Rank

2

5

1

5

4

F5

Best

0

0

0

1.14 × 10–2

0

Worst

1.09 × 10–14

4.66 × 10–2

1.72 × 10–2

4.25 × 10–2

0

Average

1.99 × 10–15

1.9 × 10–2

4.27 × 10–3

2.17 × 10–2

0

Rank

2

4

3

5

1

F6

Best

1.35 × 10–32

1.35 × 10–32

1.35 × 10–32

1.71 × 10+1

1.35 × 10–32

Worst

4.69 × 10–31

9.89 × 10–2

5.99 × 10–31

2.43 × 10+1

1.76 × 10–1

Average

4.83 × 10–32

1.32 × 10–2

5.94 × 10–32

2.13 × 10+1

1.54 × 10–2

Rank

1

4

2

5

3

F7

Best

0

0

0

5.79 × 10–7

4.94 × 10–8

Worst

0

1.11 × 10–16

4.44 × 10–16

2.75 × 10–4

1.07 × 10–4

Average

0

1.11 × 10–17

4.86 × 10–17

7.52 × 10–5

1.56 × 10–5

Rank

1

2

3

5

4

F8

Best

2 × 10–1

2 × 10–1

3 × 10–1

6 × 10–1

1.49 × 10–29

Worst

4 × 10–1

5 × 10–1

5 × 10–1

8.95 × 10–1

2.88 × 10–29

Average

3.33 × 10–1

3.93 × 10–1

3.39 × 10–1

7.38 × 10–1

2.15 × 10–29

Rank

2

3

3

4

1

50

F4

Best

1.5 × 10–32

4.28 × 10–18

6.81 × 10–15

1.05 × 10+2

6.27 × 10–1

Worst

5.94 × 10–29

5.91

1.25 × 10–6

1.44 × 10+2

1.79

Average

8.57 × 10–30

2.73

1.13 × 10–7

1.25 × 10+2

1.02

Rank

1

4

2

5

3

F5

Best

0

2.22 × 10–16

0

8.62

0

Worst

2.46 × 10–2

4.41 × 10–2

9.45 × 10–2

1.35 × 10+1

0

Average

4.92 × 10–3

1.54 × 10–2

1.43 × 10–2

1.1 × 10+1

0

Rank

2

4

3

5

1

F6

Best

1.97 × 10–32

2.35 × 10–16

4.03 × 10–13

1.51 × 10+8

9.85 × 10–32

Worst

2.10 × 10–2

2.13

1.1 × 10–2

2.85 × 10+8

1.08 × 10–1

Average

2.87 × 10–3

2.33

7.34 × 10–7

2.21 × 10+8

1.67 × 10–2

Rank

2

4

1

5

3

F7

Best

0

0

0

9.46 × 10–6

4.24 × 10–8

Worst

0

1.11 × 10–16

0

4.93 × 10–4

2.6 × 10–4

Average

0

7.86 × 10–18

0

1.37 × 10–4

4.4 × 10–5

Rank

1

2

1

4

3

F8

Best

5 × 10–1

6 × 10–1

5 × 10–1

6.06

1.23 × 10–29

Worst

9 × 10–1

1.20

8 × 10–1

7.32

5.3 × 10–29

Average

6.33 × 10–1

9.07 × 10–1

7.13 × 10–1

6.79

3.26 × 10–29

Rank

2

4

3

5

1

Final score

16

36

22

48

24

Final rank

1

4

2

5

3