Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical analysis of the event sand layers (S1 to S10)

From: Paleotsunami history of Hachinohe, northern Japan: a multiproxy analysis and numerical modeling approach

Sand unit

Grain size analysis

Computed tomography

Paleontological indicators: marine diatom species/shell fragments

Carbonate content

Magnetic susceptibility

Micro X-ray fluorescence by ITRAX (description for the main core—H02)

X-ray diffraction

Modeled depositional age (2σ)

Grading

Sorting vertical change

Thickness change

Basal contact

Flow structures

Lateral change

Titanium

Rubidium

Ca/Ta (clastic/mud ratio)

Glauconite

S1

Massive

No change

Not continuous

Bioturbated

Not visible

–

–

–

No change

Peak

Low-peak

–

1239–1924 cal BP

S2

Massive

No change

Not continuous

Bioturbated

Not visible

–

–

–

No change

Peak

High-Peak

–

1935–2774 cal BP

S3

Massive

No change

Not continuous

Bioturbated

Not visible

–

–

–

No change

Peak

Low-peak

–

1935–2774 cal BP

S4

Massive

Upward increase

Landward thinning

Bioturbated

Not visible

–

0.1%

Landward decrease

Constant

Constant

High-flat

Yes

2769–3068 cal BP

S5

Upward fining (skewness variation and phi mode change)

Upward sorting decrease—presence of coarse pumice towards the top

Landward thinning

Erosive

Not visible

1 specie (Fallacia sp.)/shell fragment (Fig. 11)

0.2%

Landward decrease

Upward reduction

Upward increase

High-upward reduction

Yes

3020–3499 cal BP

S6

Constant

No change

Landward thinning

Planar contact

Not visible

Not recorded

0%

Landward decrease

Constant

Peak

Low-constant

Yes

3469–3859 cal BP

S7

Upward coarsening at H02

Upward increase

Landward thinning

Bioturbated

Not visible

3 species (Adoneis sp.; Fallacia sp.; Melosira moniliformis)

0%

Landward increase—decrease

Slightly upward increase

Upward decrease

Moderate-upward increase

Yes

3823–4362 cal BP

S8

Upward coarsening—massive—upward fining in H02

Upward finning in H03 and H04

Upward increase—upward decrease (inclusion of coarse and rounded grains of pumice)

Landward thinning

Erosive.Erosive surface bounding the two subunits

Rip-up clast at the base

4 species (Adoneis sp.; Delphineis sp.; Diploneis smithii; Melosira moniliformis)

0%

Landward decrease

Upward increase—upward reduction

Lower unit: upward decrease

Upper unit: constant

Low peak in the base, rapid increase, constant in the middle part and upward fining in the last 1/3

Yes

4286–4784 cal BP

S9

Massive

No change

Landward thickening and thinning

Erosive. Erosive surface bounding the two subunits

Rip-up clast in the interbedding mud-layer, flame structure

1 specie (Adoneis sp.)

0.1%

Not significant change

Upward reduction in two pulses

Peak

Low in the base, moderate in the upper part

No

4677–5012 cal BP

S10

Upward fining in the distal core sample (H04)

No change

Landward thinning

Erosive

Not visible

2 species (Adoneis sp.; Melosira moniliformis)

0.3%

Landward decrease

Upward reduction, increase and constant

Upward increase

High—Upward reduction

Yes

4942–5522 cal BP

  1. For lateral correlation of the sand layers S1 to S10, see Sect. 5 in the body text