Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of puncta-filling cements to the isotopic composition and minor element concentrations of shell samples. We assume that the isotopic composition and minor element concentrations of the puncta-filling cements are identical to those of the cement formed by meteoric diagenesis. Then, we calculate the isotopic composition and minor element concentrations of the mixtures of shell and puncta-filling cements when the punctae are filled with such cements

From: The effects of meteoric diagenesis on the geochemical composition and microstructure of Pliocene fossil Terebratalia coreanica and Laqueus rubellus brachiopod shells from northeastern Japan

 

Modern shell

Cement

Puncta filling cements accounting for 5% of the shell volumes

Puncta filling cements accounting for 10% of the shell volumes

Shell + cement

Δ*

Shell + cement

Δ*

T. coreanica

 Interval 2

  δ13C (‰)

1.01 to 1.36

− 18

0.06 to 0.39

− 0.96

− 0.89 to − 0.58

− 1.92

  δ18O (‰)

1.17 to 1.43

− 7

0.76 to 1.01

− 0.42

0.35 to 0.59

− 0.83

  Mn (ppm)

3**

6000

310

300

610

600

  Fe (ppm)

70**

14,000

770

700

1500

1400

  Sr (ppm)

960**

400

930

− 30

900

− 60

L. rubellus

 Interval 2

  δ13C (‰)

1.49 to 1.94

− 18

0.52 to 0.94

− 0.99

− 0.46 to 0.05

−  1.97

  δ18O (‰)

0.55 to 0.93

− 7

0.17 to 0.53

− 0.39

− 0.21 to 0.14

−  0.78

  Mn (ppm)

7**

6000

300

300

600

590

  Fe (ppm)

120**

14,000

810

690

1500

1380

  Sr (ppm)

820**

400

800

− 20

780

− 40

  1. *Δ = “shell + cement” − “modern shell”
  2. **Median