Elastostatic effects around a magma reservoir and pathway due to historic earthquakes: a case study of Mt. Fuji, Japan

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

Table 1 Fault parameters used in this study. The parameters for (a) and (b) follow Chesley et al. (2012). Those for (c) are from a geodetic study (Nishimura et al. 2011) including the largest aftershock. We set the parameters for (d) on the basis of underground and surface fault geometry (Sato et al. 2004; Panayotopoulos et al. 2014). The parameters for (e) are from Ishibashi (1977)

Name	Long.^a [° E]	Lati.^a [° N]	Depth^a [km]	Length [km]	Width [km]	Strike [°]	Dip [°]	Rake [°]	Slip [m]
(a)-1	138.706	35.120	6.4	120	50	193	20	71	5.6
(a)-2	138.235	33.823	4.1	205	100	246	10	113	7.0
(a)-3	136.074	33.006	7.8	155	100	251	12	113	5.6
(a)-4	134.481	32.614	10.1	135	120	250	8	113	9.2
(a)-5	133.130	32.200	10.0	70	80	250	8	118	9.2
(b)-1	139.748	34.836	2.0	85	50	315	30	153	6.7
(b)-2	140.360	34.954	2.0	57	23	255	20	90	12.0
(c)-1	143.815	38.994	8.0	90	76	204	16	119	40.90
(c)-2	143.494	38.303	7.9	130	122	204	17	90	17.40
(c)-3	142.680	37.285	7.9	147	104	204	16	85	4.70
(c)-4	141.777	36.106	8.7	59	61	211	26	104	3.76
(d)-1	137.840	36.570	0.0	23.0	30	13	14	90	10.0
(d)-2	137.950	36.240	0.0	34.6	30	346	14	90	10.0
(d)-3	138.074	36.125	0.0	10.8	15	347	90	0	9.0
(e)-1	138.730	35.140	2.0	115	70	198	34	71	4.0
(e)-2	138.130	33.900	3.0	150	100	245	24	113	4.0

^aLocations at the southern corner of an upper edge of a rectangular fault when the strike is 0°