Fig. 9From: Effect of width, amplitude, and position of a core mantle boundary hot spot on core convection and dynamo action m=1 dominance for equatorial anomalies. Relative kinetic energy contribution of the m=1 flows (E m1, solid lines) and the EAA contribution (dashed) for anomalies of various tilt angles (τ) as a function of anomaly width Ψ for a hydrodynamic and b self-consistent dynamo simulations. Parameters: Ra=4×107, q ∗=1.0, Pm=2 (dynamo) or Pm=0 (hydrodynamic)Back to article page