Direct comparison of site-specific and basin-scale denudation rate estimation by in situ cosmogenic nuclides: an example from the Abukuma Mountains, Japan

Abstract

Accurate determination of denudation rates is important in understanding Earth surface system dynamics. In situ produced cosmogenic nuclides, such as ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, provide a valuable insight but are not entirely free from complications. In this study, denudation rates are determined for the Abukuma Mountains, Japan, using both site-specific and basin-scale methods. Considered with density measured in the field, distinct and systematic differences between the two methods are identified. Site-specific rates calculated from depth profiles of cosmogenic nuclides (¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al) at topographic highs indicate a rate of 67 to 85 mm/kyr, whereas basin-scale averaged denudation rates derived from the concentration of cosmogenic nuclides in fluvial sediments show 114 to 180 mm/kyr. This is the first comparison of these two commonly used methods in the same region in Japan, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite. These results indicate that differential denudation rates between topographic highs and valleys reflect increasing local topographic relief of the study area. Comparison between rates derived from depth profiles and those applicable to the entire basin is important for understanding landscape development.

Background

Site-specific and basin-scale denudation rates

Quantifying denudation rates is important across a diverse range of disciplines in geology, geomorphology, and paleoclimatology (Yokoyama et al. 2005; Yokoyama and Esat 2011). Denudation is often associated with sediment generation, which exposes fresh rock to CO₂-consuming weathering reactions, and with creating soil, changing landforms, and moving mass from continents to oceans (Berner et al. 1983; Matsumoto and Yokoyama 2013). While numerous studies underline the significance and complexity of relationships between denudation, tectonics, and climatic processes (e.g., Granger and Riebe 2007 and references therein; Shiroya et al. 2013), determination of long-term denudation rates over the timescales of soil formation and transport has, until recently, remained difficult. In situ cosmogenic nuclide concentrations such as ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al are directly related to denudation rate, allowing quantification on long-term timescales (Gosse and Phillips 2001). Initial application of cosmogenic nuclides to denudation rate determination was limited to areas of widely distributed, exposed rock, often at high latitudes or in arid environments (e.g., Nishiizumi et al. 1986; Cockburn et al. 1999). Later work employed these methods in more humid regions, where soil covers much of the land surface (e.g., Heimsath et al. 2001a).

There are two common methods for determining denudation rates using in situ cosmogenic nuclides in humid regions. One relies on fluvial sediments to obtain basin-scale averaged rates (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996), and the other uses depth profiles obtained from topographic highs to determine site-specific rates (Siame et al. 2004; Matsushi et al. 2006). Combination of these two methods has the potential for providing greater insight into the complex surface processes and landscape development in any particular region (Brown et al. 1995). In this study, we present a direct comparison between denudation rates determined from these two methods in the same lithological region, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite.

The regional topographic relief increases if denudation rates on topographic highs are less than basin-scale averaged rates. In contrast, a reduction in relief occurs if the rates on topographic highs exceed basin-scale rates. Comparison of denudation rates from soil-mantled upland obtained from single samples, rather than a depth profile, with basin-scale averaged rates has been previously performed in the Oregon Coast Range (Heimsath et al. 2001a), Australian southeastern highlands (Heimsath et al. 2001b, 2006), and German Black Forest (Meyer et al. 2010). Comparison between summit bedrock and basin-averaged denudation rates has also been performed in the Negev Desert (Clapp et al. 2000), southern Africa (Bierman and Caffee 2001), and the Appalachians (Hancock and Kirwan 2007; Portenga et al. 2013). The advantage of a depth profile of in situ cosmogenic nuclides is that it has the potential to provide information about equilibrium conditions, which cannot be obtained from a single sample.

Denudation rates from in situ cosmogenic nuclides

Measuring in situ cosmogenic nuclides in river-born sediments allows investigation of denudation rates on drainage basin scales (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996; Riebe et al. 2000; Moon et al. 2011; Siame et al. 2011). If exposure to cosmic rays is sufficiently long with respect to the denudation rate, the accumulation of in situ-produced ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al reaches a secular equilibrium, providing information on the maximum denudation rate (Lal 1991). Because rivers carry and mix the sediment produced within a given drainage basin, denudation rates deduced from river-born quartz were identified as ideal material for quantifying denudation rates of an entire watershed (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996).

Although the principle is simple, the culmination of a series of assumptions and approximations may compound some uncertainty. Stream sediment is not always representative of the entire watershed, especially within smaller watersheds prone to episodic mass wasting (Niemi et al. 2005; Granger and Riebe 2007). Storage and burial of river sediments would also disturb the initial concentration of cosmogenic nuclides by radioactive decay, which creates a case where the measured nuclide concentration underestimates the steady-state nuclide concentration (Wittmann et al. 2011). This methodology has been tested for small (1 to 10 km²; Granger et al. 1996) and large (10² to 10⁵ km²; Schaller et al. 2001) drainage basins, as well as in different geologic and climatic settings (Portenga and Bierman 2011 and references therein). Many regional-scale cosmogenic studies indicate that environmental parameters, such as precipitation, temperature, altitude, basin slope, and tectonics, can influence denudation rates (Riebe et al. 2000; von Blanckenburg 2005; Henck et al. 2011; Moon et al. 2011, Siame et al. 2011). However, quantitative assessment of the contributions from independent environmental parameters is still under debate, due in part to the lack of direct comparison between basin scale and site-specific denudation rates.

Depth profiles of in situ cosmogenic nuclides allow determination of site-specific denudation rates in humid regions without the complex assumptions required for basin-scale studies (Siame et al. 2004; Matsushi et al. 2006). Topographic highs such as mountain summits, hilltops, and ridges are appropriate sites for depth profiling due to the minimized influence of along-slope mass transport (Shiroya et al. 2010). Another advantage stemming from the usage of depth profiles is that information regarding nuclide equilibrium is also obtained (see the following). Cumulative concentration of a particular nuclide at an outcrop is a function of the denudation rate (D) and exposure age (T), so that measurement of one nuclide (typically ¹⁰Be) at the surface cannot uniquely identify D and T. The use of depth profiles has recently been introduced to alleviate this problem (Siame et al. 2004; Braucher et al. 2009). Depth profiles have been used to determine the ages of fluvial terraces (Hein et al. 2009; Hidy et al. 2010; Rixhon et al. 2011).

In this study, we present denudation rates for a granitic saprolite in the Abukuma Mountains, Japan, using in situ cosmogenic nuclides measured in both depth profile and fluvial sediments. A known saprolite density is required to determine the denudation rate using cosmogenic nuclides. However, previous studies have often treated density as a free parameter (Siame et al. 2004; Rixhon et al. 2011). Therefore, we also conduct actual field measurements of the saprolite density. Together with ²⁶Al/¹⁰Be plots of fluvial sediment, these data indicate that there are distinct variations in denudation rates obtained from the topographic highs and from basin-scale approaches.

Study area and sampling strategy

The Abukuma Mountains, a major granitic terrain in Japan, formed as an uplifted peneplain (e.g., Koike 1968) (Figure 1). The mountains consist of low-relief hills of granitic saprolite at an elevation of 400 to 600 m above sea level covered by soil and vegetation. Freshly exposed bedrock and gully development are not observed. Because the mountains are not steep, landslides are also not reported in this region (Shimizu and Oyagi 1988). The Abukuma granitic terrain is petrologically separated by the N-S trending Hatagawa fracture zone and the Futaba fault (Figure 1). Recent activity of a west-dipping reverse fault with a dip slip rate of 50 to 100 mm/kyr has been reported for Futaba fault (Fukushimaken 1999). Annual mean precipitation is 1,465 mm with a peak in September, and annual mean temperature is 10.3°C (calculated from 1981 to 2010 at Kawauchi, Japan; http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/indexe.html).

Figure 1

The Abukuma Mountains, a major granitic terrain in Japan, formed as an uplifted peneplain. (a) Location of the study area. (b) Digital elevation map of the sampling sites. (c) Close-up of the catchments. Elevation data is obtained from ASTER GDEM (http://gdem.ersdac.jspacesystems.or.jp/). Black dots indicate the sampling sites for depth profiles. Open squares indicate the sampling sites for fluvial sediments. Catchments of the sites are also indicated as solid lines. Numbers described are denudation rates (mm/kyr) obtained from this study.

Depth profile sampling sites, ABK101 (N 37.384, E 140.824) and ABK103 (N 37.482, E 140.778), are roadside outcrops covered by approximately 20 cm of black soil and are located near the topographic highs in the eastern part of the Abukuma Mountains at an altitude of 620 and 540 m, respectively (Figures 1 and 2, Table 1). These are rounded, gently sloping, and deeply weathered (>3 m deep), which indicates no significant influence from catastrophic mass wasting. The saprolite exhibits original granitic textures, also indicating that no significant disturbance or mixing has occurred during in situ weathering. The entire study area is characterized by soil of relatively uniform thickness that is underlain by well-developed saprolite to appreciable depth. Samples for cosmogenic nuclide measurement were collected from below the soil horizon. Plastic tubes (5 cm long) were placed into the granitic saprolite to determine its wet and dry density (Figure 3). Here, we use mean wet bulk density at the sampling site for calculation because granitic saprolite contains water, in contrast to fresh rock. ABK-R1 (N 37.431, E 140.754) and ABK-R3 (N 37.450, E 140.807) are the fluvial sites, located in the Takase River (Figure 1, Table 1). The catchment areas of the fluvial sampling sites are between ABK101 and ABK103 and do not include the Hatagawa fracture zone.

Figure 2

Columnar sections and photographic views of sampling sites.

Table 1 Site parameters and geometric properties of the drainage basins sampled for cosmogenic measurements

Figure 3

The sampled saprolite. (a) Plastic tubes were placed into the granitic saprolite. (b) The sampled saprolite shows the original granite textures, indicating that no disturbance occurred during sampling.

Methods

Samples for depth profiles were crushed to a grain size of 0.35 to 1 mm, and quartz grains were subsequently separated by chemical etching following the method of Kohl and Nishiizumi (1992). River sediments were sieved to 0.35 to 1 mm size fractions for analysis. The purified quartz samples (approximately 25 g) were dissolved with HF and spiked with Be carrier (approximately 0.3 mg). Aliquots for Be and Al were separated by column chromatography and then oxidized for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements at the University of Tokyo. The standards used were 07KNSTD (KNB5-1) for ¹⁰Be (¹⁰Be/⁹Be ratio 2.709 × 10⁻¹¹; Nishiizumi et al. 2007) and KNSTD (KNA4-2) for ²⁶Al (²⁶Al/²⁷Al ratio 3.029 × 10⁻¹¹; Nishiizumi 2004). The decrease in cosmogenic nuclide concentrations with depth has previously been modeled using a chi-square (χ²) inversion method (Siame et al. 2004; Braucher et al. 2009). For a surface experiencing denudation at rate ϵ (cm/year) during a time interval dt, the concentration of cosmogenic nuclides C (atoms/g) with time t (year), and depth x (cm) is described as

$$\frac{\partial \mathit{C}}{\partial \mathit{t}}={\mathit{P}}_0{\mathit{e}}^{\frac{-\mathit{\rho x}}{\mathit{\Lambda }}}+\mathit{ϵ}\frac{\partial \mathit{C}}{\partial \mathit{x}}-\mathit{C\lambda }$$

(1)

where P ₀ (atoms/g/year) is the surface production rate, Λ (g/cm²) is the attenuation length, ρ (g/cm³) is the density, and λ is the radioactive decay constant (year⁻¹) for ¹⁰Be (5.10 × 10⁻⁷) (Nishiizumi et al. 2007) and ²⁶Al (9.83 × 10⁻⁷) (Nishiizumi 2004). Considering the three reaction mechanisms (neutrons, stopping, and fast muons) and assuming constant rates of denudation, Equation 1 is solved as follows using the initial condition at time t = 0 that C = 0.

$$\begin{array}{ll}\mathit{C}\left(\mathit{x},\mathit{t}\right)=& \frac{{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{spal}}}{\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{spal}}}+\mathit{\lambda }}{\mathit{e}}^{\frac{-\mathit{\rho x}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{spal}}}}\left(1-{\mathit{e}}^{-\left(\mathit{\lambda }+\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{spal}}}\right)\mathit{t}}\right)\\ +\frac{{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{stop}}}{\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{stop}}}+\mathit{\lambda }}{\mathit{e}}^{\frac{-\mathit{\rho x}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{stop}}}}\left(1-{\mathit{e}}^{-\left(\mathit{\lambda }+\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{stop}}}\right)\mathit{t}}\right)\\ +\frac{{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{fast}}}{\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{fast}}}+\mathit{\lambda }}{\mathit{e}}^{\frac{-\mathit{\rho x}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{fast}}}}\left(1-{\mathit{e}}^{-\left(\mathit{\lambda }+\frac{\mathit{\rho ϵ}}{{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{fast}}}\right)\mathit{t}}\right)\end{array}$$

(2)

Here, P _spal, P _stop, and P _fast are surface production rates for the three production mechanisms, and Λ _spal, Λ _stop, and Λ _fast are the effective attenuation lengths, respectively, of those three rates. Production rates for neutrons are scaled using the method of Stone (2000) based on the reference ¹⁰Be production rate of 4.49 (atoms/g/year) with ²⁶Al/¹⁰Be = 6.75 (Balco et al. 2008). Production rates for muons are calculated following Braucher et al. (2011). This study uses the values: Λ _spal = 160 (g/cm²), (Lal 1991; Brown et al., 1995), Λ _stop = 1,500 (g/cm²), Λ _fast = 4,320 (g/cm²) (Heisinger et al. 2002a, [b]; Braucher et al. 2011).

The χ² inversion model (Siame et al. 2004) for best fitting of the model is as follows:

$${\mathit{\chi }}^2={\displaystyle \sum _{\mathit{i}=1}^{\mathit{N}}{\left(\frac{{\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{i}}-\mathit{C}\left({\mathit{x}}_{\mathit{i}},\mathit{ϵ},\mathit{t}\right)}{{\mathit{\sigma }}_{\mathit{i}}}\right)}^2}$$

(3)

Here, C _i and σ _i are the measured cosmogenic nuclide concentration and its standard deviation at the depth x _i , respectively, and C(x _i , ϵ, t) is the theoretical concentration computed using Equation 3 with a given time-denudation (ϵ, t) pair. A nuclide concentration at a variety of depths below the surface can provide both D and T information. Not only does this approach allow determination of ages (Hein et al. 2009; Hidy et al. 2010; Rixhon et al. 2011) but also allows testing of the equilibrium condition. On topographic highs, where cosmic ray exposure is infinitely long, exposure time calculated by the χ² method is expected to indicate equilibrium. If mass movement has significantly influenced the outcrop, χ² inversion would exhibit lower, nonequilibrium values. Therefore, this method is useful for confirming the existence of the equilibrium condition, which is required to accurately calculate denudation rates. Uncertainties of denudation rates include both uncertainty of density and uncertainty of χ² inversion, determined as χ² ≤ χ² _min + 1 following the method of Rixhon et al. (2011).

Basin-scale denudation rates from river-born quartz are also determined following the method of Granger et al. (1996), where the terms are the same as those listed previously.

$$\mathit{ϵ}=\frac{{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{spal}}{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{spal}}+{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{stop}}{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{stop}}+{\mathit{P}}_{\mathrm{fast}}{\mathit{\Lambda }}_{\mathrm{fast}}}{\mathit{C\rho }}$$

(4)

Mean altitudes of the catchments calculated by ArcGIS with ASTER GDEM elevation data (http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/) are used for production rates of fluvial sediments (Table 1). The effects of topographic shielding are insignificant and therefore not included because the production rate is not affected by the low-relief geometry of the study area.

Results

χ²fitting for the depth profiles

Measured wet bulk densities ranged between 1.59 and 1.68 g/cm³ with no systematic depth trend (Figure 4, Table 2). Similar stability of the dry bulk density indicates constant water content. Therefore, we used the average wet bulk density of each sampling site for calculation of cosmogenic nuclide depth profiles. The values are 1.66 ± 0.07 and 1.61 ± 0.07 g/cm³ for sites ABK101 and ABK103, respectively.

Figure 4

Dry density (open circles), wet density (filled circles), and water content (squares) of the samples.

Table 2 Summary of density measurements

Figure 5 shows that measured ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al concentrations decrease exponentially with depth (Table 3). Low χ² values are distributed parallel to the axes of exposure age (Figure 6). Therefore, χ² fitting indicates that steady-state concentrations have been reached. Denudation rates at site ABK101 are 73 ± 9 and 85 ± 9 mm/kyr for ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, respectively, whereas 67 ± 9 and 82 ± 11 mm/kyr were measured for ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, respectively, at site ABK103 (Figures 5 and 6). The uncertainty reflects uncertainties in both measurements of density and χ² inversion. Although the modeled curves are not perfectly fit to the measured concentration, two independent lines of evidence indicate that the derived denudation rates are reliable. First, rates calculated from both ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al are consistent, and second, both sampling sites exhibit almost identical denudation rates. Thus, we interpret that the cosmogenic nuclides data accurately represent local denudation rates. It should be noted that relatively large χ² values are observed for ¹⁰Be profiles compared with ²⁶Al profiles at site ABK103 (Figure 6). This might due to relatively high ¹⁰Be/⁹Be ratios for the process blanks (Table 3) compared with those used in recent publications (e.g., Larsen et al. 2014).

Figure 5

Depth profile of cosmogenic nuclides (circles) with model-best-fit (curve) concentrations based on steady denudation (Equation 2). Error bars show analytical uncertainties (1σ).

Table 3 Summary of sample data from the Abukuma Mountains

Figure 6

Contour plots of the log( χ² ) based on Equation 2. Blue areas indicate where equilibrium conditions are reasonable.

Denudation rates from fluvial sediments

Basin-scale denudation rates are calculated from the concentration of cosmogenic nuclides using Equation 4. For river sediments, we used 1.63 ± 0.07 g/cm³ as the density of the basin, which is the average value of sites ABK101 and ABK103. This assumption is justified because these two values are consistent within their uncertainties. Furthermore, well-developed saprolite is widespread and representative at the scale of the entire catchment, which allows us to calculate the denudation rates for the basins using the measured density at the sites of the depth profiles. The catchment-averaged denudation rate of site ABK-R1 is 123 ± 14 and 114 ± 18 mm/kyr, as obtained from ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, respectively. ABK-R3 exhibits rates of 167 ± 17 and 180 ± 26 mm/kyr from ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, respectively. In most previous studies, only a single nuclide, typically ¹⁰Be, is measured for determination of catchment-averaged denudation rate. However, denudation rates derived from a single nuclide may be biased by complex exposure histories (Wittmann et al. 2011). In order to test the steady-state denudation model, the data are plotted on an ‘erosion-island’ graph (Lal 1991) (Figure 7). The plots show close agreement between denudation rates based on ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al, within error limits, inside the ‘erosion-island’ area, supporting that these samples do not record complex exposure histories. Although complex histories of sediment transportation cannot be ruled out completely because of the large uncertainties, the combination of ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al results indicates negligible Myr-scale sediment burial. The large uncertainties are more likely the result of low cosmogenic nuclide concentration, resulting from the fast denudation rate taking place in low elevation area, which leads low nuclide production.

Figure 7

Plot of ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios versus ¹⁰ Be concentration of fluvial samples with 1 σ errors. ¹⁰Be concentrations are normalized for values at sea level and high latitude. Zero denudation and steady-state denudation lines are shown as solid lines. ²⁶Al/¹⁰Be ratios indicate that these samples do not have complex exposure histories detected by the ²⁶Al/¹⁰Be system.

Discussion

Density dependence of nuclide concentration profiles

Denudation rates calculated from Equations 2 and 4 are highly sensitive to density variation, with large changes resulting from reasonable density adjustments. For example, substitution of 2.00 g/cm³ for the measured value of 1.66 g/cm³ changes the ¹⁰Be denudation rate of ABK101 from 73 to 54 mm/kyr, a 25% change resulting from only a 0.34 g/cm³ shift in density. This underscores the importance of accurate density measurements, as has been previously reported by several authors.

Braucher et al. (2009) suggested that the density used by Hidy et al. (2005) was too high and advocated consideration of density as a free parameter for denudation and time. Hidy et al. (2010) measured density by inserting a pliable plastic bag into the sampling hole and filling it with a measured quantity of water to determine the volume of the excavated mass of rock. They state that density measured in the field should be considered a maximum value because excavation of a very coarse boulder to gravel-sized fillings may lead to systematic error. They therefore allowed the density to vary randomly using Monte Carlo simulations. Rixhon et al. (2011) treated density as a free parameter, adjusting it within a 1.8 to 2.4 g/cm³ range.

Although these studies have attempted to identify density variations, accurate measurement of density for terrace sediments is complicated by the presence of boulders. In contrast, we successfully measured density by employing the newly developed technique of using constant volume plastic tubes for granitic saprolite. Time-dependent variation in density (Rodés et al. 2011) is negligible in the study area because of the homogeneous distribution of granitic saprolite with little differential weathering. Measured density exhibits a constant value with depth, indicating that chemical weathering gradients are not significant for the time scale of interest. In addition, granitic saprolite is widely and homogenously distributed at scales larger than outcrop size (>3 m deep, >10 m wide). Therefore, denudation rates determined in our study are indicative of those following saprolite formation. Note that the density of soil above the saprolite was not measured because plant roots blocked the sampling tube. Nevertheless, density of soil does not affect our interpretation because its thickness is only 20 cm and its density, typically regarded as 1.4–1.8 g/cm³ (Siame et al. 2011; Heimsath et al. 2012), is indistinguishable from that of the saprolite.

We reanalyzed the denudation rates reported by Shiroya et al. (2010) in the western part of the Abukuma Mountains using actual measured density. They determined denudation rates from the depth profile of a quartz vein in granitic saprolite along a mountain ridge assuming 2.2 g/cm³ for the density of wet granitic saprolite. The reported denudation rates were 61 + 6/–4 and 62 + 4/–3 mm/kyr based on ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al depth profiles, respectively. In the current study, we applied the actual density of the rock at this site (1.76 ± 0.03 g/cm³) and parameters described in Shiroya et al. (2010) for recalculation, which resulted in rates of 86 ± 2 and 89 ± 3 mm/kyr for ¹⁰Be and ²⁶Al-based determinations, respectively. These values are 1.4 times larger than the initial values reported by Shiroya et al. (2010), indicating that direct density measurements are indeed crucial for determining accurate denudation rates. These reanalyzed values are consistent with values obtained from sites ABK101 and ABK103 in the present study. Hence, the three sampling sites at topographic highs in the Abukuma Mountains show consistent values between 67 and 89 mm/kyr.

Comparison between depth profile and fluvial methods

Denudation rates deduced from analyses of fluvial sediments are 1.3 to 2.7 times larger than those determined from depth profiles (p < 0.01). Multiple depth profiles of cosmogenic nuclides provide the denudation rate of the summit plane, whereas fluvial sediments represent a basin-scale average. Thus, our measurements show that there are contrasts in denudation rates between topographic highs and the entire basin as a whole, primarily due to differences in surficial gradient. This supports previous studies that found that the slope angle of a basin significantly affects the overall denudation rate (Riebe et al. 2000; von Blanckenburg 2005). However, it should be noted that the mean basin slope is 13.9° and 12.0° for ABK-R1 and ABK-R3, respectively (Table 1), indicating that fluvial denudation rates are not sensitive to small differences in slope angles in the study area before the threshold for hill slope stability is reached. The slow upper stream denudation rate is also not attributed to the spatial distribution of the slope angle because the two basins exhibit a similar slope pattern (Figure 8). The lower basin-scale denudation rate of ABK-R1 compared with ABK-R3 is likely derived from localized low denudation rates due in part to its location proximal to the ridgeline.

Figure 8

Spatial distribution of slope angle.

Subtraction of the site-specific denudation rate from the basin-scale rate (29 to 113 mm/kyr) represents the rate of change of local topographic relief. Overall, local topographic relief of the Abukuma Mountain is interpreted to be increasing. This is the first comparison of these two methods in the same lithological region in Japan, which allows us to quantitatively investigate regional landscape evolution. Yamamoto (2005) showed that fluvial incision rates, based on tephrostratigraphy, are 80 to 150 mm/kyr during the Late Quaternary according to the relative height of fluvial terraces. This is consistent with our results. Comparison between rates derived from depth profiles and those applicable to the entire basin is important for understanding landscape development. This requires careful site selection of topographic highs in order to obtain denudation rates that have minimal potential slope influence.

Conclusions

We compare denudation rates derived from cosmogenic nuclide data from the Abukuma Mountains between summits and catchments. This is the first comparison of these two methods in the same lithological region, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite. Slope angle strongly affects the basin-scale averaged denudation rates by as much as 1.3 to 2.7 times, whereas rates derived from depth profiles at summit sites are unaffected. The importance of physical density measurements, as opposed to modeled values, to obtain accurate denudation rates is demonstrated. Denudation rates of topographic highs inferred from depth profiles of cosmogenic nuclides are 67 to 85 mm/kyr, whereas basin-scale denudation rates derived from concentration of cosmogenic nuclides in fluvial sediments indicate 114 to 180 mm/kyr.