Direct comparison of site-specific and basin-scale denudation rate estimation by in situ cosmogenic nuclides: an example from the Abukuma Mountains, Japan
© Nakamura et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 6 December 2013
Accepted: 23 April 2014
Published: 21 May 2014
Accurate determination of denudation rates is important in understanding Earth surface system dynamics. In situ produced cosmogenic nuclides, such as 10Be and 26Al, provide a valuable insight but are not entirely free from complications. In this study, denudation rates are determined for the Abukuma Mountains, Japan, using both site-specific and basin-scale methods. Considered with density measured in the field, distinct and systematic differences between the two methods are identified. Site-specific rates calculated from depth profiles of cosmogenic nuclides (10Be and 26Al) at topographic highs indicate a rate of 67 to 85 mm/kyr, whereas basin-scale averaged denudation rates derived from the concentration of cosmogenic nuclides in fluvial sediments show 114 to 180 mm/kyr. This is the first comparison of these two commonly used methods in the same region in Japan, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite. These results indicate that differential denudation rates between topographic highs and valleys reflect increasing local topographic relief of the study area. Comparison between rates derived from depth profiles and those applicable to the entire basin is important for understanding landscape development.
KeywordsDenudation rate Erosion rate In situ cosmogenic nuclide 10Be and 26Al Depth profile Density
Site-specific and basin-scale denudation rates
Quantifying denudation rates is important across a diverse range of disciplines in geology, geomorphology, and paleoclimatology (Yokoyama et al. 2005; Yokoyama and Esat 2011). Denudation is often associated with sediment generation, which exposes fresh rock to CO2-consuming weathering reactions, and with creating soil, changing landforms, and moving mass from continents to oceans (Berner et al. 1983; Matsumoto and Yokoyama 2013). While numerous studies underline the significance and complexity of relationships between denudation, tectonics, and climatic processes (e.g., Granger and Riebe 2007 and references therein; Shiroya et al. 2013), determination of long-term denudation rates over the timescales of soil formation and transport has, until recently, remained difficult. In situ cosmogenic nuclide concentrations such as 10Be and 26Al are directly related to denudation rate, allowing quantification on long-term timescales (Gosse and Phillips 2001). Initial application of cosmogenic nuclides to denudation rate determination was limited to areas of widely distributed, exposed rock, often at high latitudes or in arid environments (e.g., Nishiizumi et al. 1986; Cockburn et al. 1999). Later work employed these methods in more humid regions, where soil covers much of the land surface (e.g., Heimsath et al. 2001a).
There are two common methods for determining denudation rates using in situ cosmogenic nuclides in humid regions. One relies on fluvial sediments to obtain basin-scale averaged rates (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996), and the other uses depth profiles obtained from topographic highs to determine site-specific rates (Siame et al. 2004; Matsushi et al. 2006). Combination of these two methods has the potential for providing greater insight into the complex surface processes and landscape development in any particular region (Brown et al. 1995). In this study, we present a direct comparison between denudation rates determined from these two methods in the same lithological region, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite.
The regional topographic relief increases if denudation rates on topographic highs are less than basin-scale averaged rates. In contrast, a reduction in relief occurs if the rates on topographic highs exceed basin-scale rates. Comparison of denudation rates from soil-mantled upland obtained from single samples, rather than a depth profile, with basin-scale averaged rates has been previously performed in the Oregon Coast Range (Heimsath et al. 2001a), Australian southeastern highlands (Heimsath et al. 2001b, 2006), and German Black Forest (Meyer et al. 2010). Comparison between summit bedrock and basin-averaged denudation rates has also been performed in the Negev Desert (Clapp et al. 2000), southern Africa (Bierman and Caffee 2001), and the Appalachians (Hancock and Kirwan 2007; Portenga et al. 2013). The advantage of a depth profile of in situ cosmogenic nuclides is that it has the potential to provide information about equilibrium conditions, which cannot be obtained from a single sample.
Denudation rates from in situ cosmogenic nuclides
Measuring in situ cosmogenic nuclides in river-born sediments allows investigation of denudation rates on drainage basin scales (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996; Riebe et al. 2000; Moon et al. 2011; Siame et al. 2011). If exposure to cosmic rays is sufficiently long with respect to the denudation rate, the accumulation of in situ-produced 10Be and 26Al reaches a secular equilibrium, providing information on the maximum denudation rate (Lal 1991). Because rivers carry and mix the sediment produced within a given drainage basin, denudation rates deduced from river-born quartz were identified as ideal material for quantifying denudation rates of an entire watershed (Brown et al. 1995; Bierman and Steig 1996; Granger et al. 1996).
Although the principle is simple, the culmination of a series of assumptions and approximations may compound some uncertainty. Stream sediment is not always representative of the entire watershed, especially within smaller watersheds prone to episodic mass wasting (Niemi et al. 2005; Granger and Riebe 2007). Storage and burial of river sediments would also disturb the initial concentration of cosmogenic nuclides by radioactive decay, which creates a case where the measured nuclide concentration underestimates the steady-state nuclide concentration (Wittmann et al. 2011). This methodology has been tested for small (1 to 10 km2; Granger et al. 1996) and large (102 to 105 km2; Schaller et al. 2001) drainage basins, as well as in different geologic and climatic settings (Portenga and Bierman 2011 and references therein). Many regional-scale cosmogenic studies indicate that environmental parameters, such as precipitation, temperature, altitude, basin slope, and tectonics, can influence denudation rates (Riebe et al. 2000; von Blanckenburg 2005; Henck et al. 2011; Moon et al. 2011, Siame et al. 2011). However, quantitative assessment of the contributions from independent environmental parameters is still under debate, due in part to the lack of direct comparison between basin scale and site-specific denudation rates.
Depth profiles of in situ cosmogenic nuclides allow determination of site-specific denudation rates in humid regions without the complex assumptions required for basin-scale studies (Siame et al. 2004; Matsushi et al. 2006). Topographic highs such as mountain summits, hilltops, and ridges are appropriate sites for depth profiling due to the minimized influence of along-slope mass transport (Shiroya et al. 2010). Another advantage stemming from the usage of depth profiles is that information regarding nuclide equilibrium is also obtained (see the following). Cumulative concentration of a particular nuclide at an outcrop is a function of the denudation rate (D) and exposure age (T), so that measurement of one nuclide (typically 10Be) at the surface cannot uniquely identify D and T. The use of depth profiles has recently been introduced to alleviate this problem (Siame et al. 2004; Braucher et al. 2009). Depth profiles have been used to determine the ages of fluvial terraces (Hein et al. 2009; Hidy et al. 2010; Rixhon et al. 2011).
In this study, we present denudation rates for a granitic saprolite in the Abukuma Mountains, Japan, using in situ cosmogenic nuclides measured in both depth profile and fluvial sediments. A known saprolite density is required to determine the denudation rate using cosmogenic nuclides. However, previous studies have often treated density as a free parameter (Siame et al. 2004; Rixhon et al. 2011). Therefore, we also conduct actual field measurements of the saprolite density. Together with 26Al/10Be plots of fluvial sediment, these data indicate that there are distinct variations in denudation rates obtained from the topographic highs and from basin-scale approaches.
Study area and sampling strategy
Site parameters and geometric properties of the drainage basins sampled for cosmogenic measurements
10Be production rate (atoms/g/yr)
26Al production rate (atoms/g/yr)
Mean basin altitude (m) c
Mean slope (deg)
Slow muon b
Fast muon b
Slow muon b
Fast muon b
Here, P spal, P stop, and P fast are surface production rates for the three production mechanisms, and Λ spal, Λ stop, and Λ fast are the effective attenuation lengths, respectively, of those three rates. Production rates for neutrons are scaled using the method of Stone (2000) based on the reference 10Be production rate of 4.49 (atoms/g/year) with 26Al/10Be = 6.75 (Balco et al. 2008). Production rates for muons are calculated following Braucher et al. (2011). This study uses the values: Λ spal = 160 (g/cm2), (Lal 1991; Brown et al., 1995), Λ stop = 1,500 (g/cm2), Λ fast = 4,320 (g/cm2) (Heisinger et al. 2002a, [b]; Braucher et al. 2011).
Here, C i and σ i are the measured cosmogenic nuclide concentration and its standard deviation at the depth x i , respectively, and C(x i , ϵ, t) is the theoretical concentration computed using Equation 3 with a given time-denudation (ϵ, t) pair. A nuclide concentration at a variety of depths below the surface can provide both D and T information. Not only does this approach allow determination of ages (Hein et al. 2009; Hidy et al. 2010; Rixhon et al. 2011) but also allows testing of the equilibrium condition. On topographic highs, where cosmic ray exposure is infinitely long, exposure time calculated by the χ2 method is expected to indicate equilibrium. If mass movement has significantly influenced the outcrop, χ2 inversion would exhibit lower, nonequilibrium values. Therefore, this method is useful for confirming the existence of the equilibrium condition, which is required to accurately calculate denudation rates. Uncertainties of denudation rates include both uncertainty of density and uncertainty of χ2 inversion, determined as χ2 ≤ χ2 min + 1 following the method of Rixhon et al. (2011).
Mean altitudes of the catchments calculated by ArcGIS with ASTER GDEM elevation data (http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/) are used for production rates of fluvial sediments (Table 1). The effects of topographic shielding are insignificant and therefore not included because the production rate is not affected by the low-relief geometry of the study area.
χ2fitting for the depth profiles
Summary of density measurements
Wet density (g/cm 3)
Dry density (g/cm 3)
Summary of sample data from the Abukuma Mountains
Dissolved quartz (mg)
10Be/ 9Be (10 −14)
1σ error (10 −14)
10Be concentration (10 4atoms/g)
1σ error (10 4atoms/g)
26Al/ 27Al (10 −13)
1σ error (10 −13)
26Al concentration (10 5atoms/g)
1σ error (10 5atoms/g)
Denudation rates from fluvial sediments
Density dependence of nuclide concentration profiles
Denudation rates calculated from Equations 2 and 4 are highly sensitive to density variation, with large changes resulting from reasonable density adjustments. For example, substitution of 2.00 g/cm3 for the measured value of 1.66 g/cm3 changes the 10Be denudation rate of ABK101 from 73 to 54 mm/kyr, a 25% change resulting from only a 0.34 g/cm3 shift in density. This underscores the importance of accurate density measurements, as has been previously reported by several authors.
Braucher et al. (2009) suggested that the density used by Hidy et al. (2005) was too high and advocated consideration of density as a free parameter for denudation and time. Hidy et al. (2010) measured density by inserting a pliable plastic bag into the sampling hole and filling it with a measured quantity of water to determine the volume of the excavated mass of rock. They state that density measured in the field should be considered a maximum value because excavation of a very coarse boulder to gravel-sized fillings may lead to systematic error. They therefore allowed the density to vary randomly using Monte Carlo simulations. Rixhon et al. (2011) treated density as a free parameter, adjusting it within a 1.8 to 2.4 g/cm3 range.
Although these studies have attempted to identify density variations, accurate measurement of density for terrace sediments is complicated by the presence of boulders. In contrast, we successfully measured density by employing the newly developed technique of using constant volume plastic tubes for granitic saprolite. Time-dependent variation in density (Rodés et al. 2011) is negligible in the study area because of the homogeneous distribution of granitic saprolite with little differential weathering. Measured density exhibits a constant value with depth, indicating that chemical weathering gradients are not significant for the time scale of interest. In addition, granitic saprolite is widely and homogenously distributed at scales larger than outcrop size (>3 m deep, >10 m wide). Therefore, denudation rates determined in our study are indicative of those following saprolite formation. Note that the density of soil above the saprolite was not measured because plant roots blocked the sampling tube. Nevertheless, density of soil does not affect our interpretation because its thickness is only 20 cm and its density, typically regarded as 1.4–1.8 g/cm3 (Siame et al. 2011; Heimsath et al. 2012), is indistinguishable from that of the saprolite.
We reanalyzed the denudation rates reported by Shiroya et al. (2010) in the western part of the Abukuma Mountains using actual measured density. They determined denudation rates from the depth profile of a quartz vein in granitic saprolite along a mountain ridge assuming 2.2 g/cm3 for the density of wet granitic saprolite. The reported denudation rates were 61 + 6/–4 and 62 + 4/–3 mm/kyr based on 10Be and 26Al depth profiles, respectively. In the current study, we applied the actual density of the rock at this site (1.76 ± 0.03 g/cm3) and parameters described in Shiroya et al. (2010) for recalculation, which resulted in rates of 86 ± 2 and 89 ± 3 mm/kyr for 10Be and 26Al-based determinations, respectively. These values are 1.4 times larger than the initial values reported by Shiroya et al. (2010), indicating that direct density measurements are indeed crucial for determining accurate denudation rates. These reanalyzed values are consistent with values obtained from sites ABK101 and ABK103 in the present study. Hence, the three sampling sites at topographic highs in the Abukuma Mountains show consistent values between 67 and 89 mm/kyr.
Comparison between depth profile and fluvial methods
Subtraction of the site-specific denudation rate from the basin-scale rate (29 to 113 mm/kyr) represents the rate of change of local topographic relief. Overall, local topographic relief of the Abukuma Mountain is interpreted to be increasing. This is the first comparison of these two methods in the same lithological region in Japan, which allows us to quantitatively investigate regional landscape evolution. Yamamoto (2005) showed that fluvial incision rates, based on tephrostratigraphy, are 80 to 150 mm/kyr during the Late Quaternary according to the relative height of fluvial terraces. This is consistent with our results. Comparison between rates derived from depth profiles and those applicable to the entire basin is important for understanding landscape development. This requires careful site selection of topographic highs in order to obtain denudation rates that have minimal potential slope influence.
We compare denudation rates derived from cosmogenic nuclide data from the Abukuma Mountains between summits and catchments. This is the first comparison of these two methods in the same lithological region, where the entire study area is characterized by well-developed saprolite. Slope angle strongly affects the basin-scale averaged denudation rates by as much as 1.3 to 2.7 times, whereas rates derived from depth profiles at summit sites are unaffected. The importance of physical density measurements, as opposed to modeled values, to obtain accurate denudation rates is demonstrated. Denudation rates of topographic highs inferred from depth profiles of cosmogenic nuclides are 67 to 85 mm/kyr, whereas basin-scale denudation rates derived from concentration of cosmogenic nuclides in fluvial sediments indicate 114 to 180 mm/kyr.
This work was supported by JSPS NEXT program GR031 and GCOE program. We thank Dr. L.L. Siame and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful reviews. We thank A. Suzuki, A. Horio, and S. Ochiai for their assistance and S.P. Obrochta for discussing the manuscript.
- Balco G, Stone JO, Lifton NA, Dunai TJ: A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10 Be and 26 Al measurements. Quat Geochronol 2008, 3: 174–195. 10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berner RA, Lasaga AC, Garrels RM: The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon-dioxide over the past 100 million years. Am J Sci 1983, 283: 641–683. 10.2475/ajs.283.7.641View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bierman PR, Caffee M: Slow rates of rock surface erosion and sediment production across the Namib Desert and escarpment, southern Africa. Am J Sci 2001, 301: 326–358. 10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.326View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bierman PR, Steig EJ: Estimating rates of denudation using cosmogenic isotope abundances in sediment. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 1996, 21: 125–139. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199602)21:2<125::AID-ESP511>3.0.CO;2-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braucher R, Del Castillo P, Siame L, Hidy AJ, Bourles DL: Determination of both exposure time and denudation rate from an in situ-produced 10 Be depth profile: a mathematical proof of uniqueness. Model sensitivity and applications to natural cases. Quat Geochronol 2009, 4: 56–67. 10.1016/j.quageo.2008.06.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braucher R, Merchel S, Borgomano J, Bourles DL: Production of cosmogenic radionuclides at great depth: A multi element approach. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2011, 309: 1–9. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.06.036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown ET, Stallard RF, Larsen MC, Raisbeck GM, Yiou F: Denudation rates determined from the accumulation of in situ-produced 10 Be in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto-Rico. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1995, 129: 193–202. 10.1016/0012-821X(94)00249-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clapp EM, Bierman PR, Schick AP, Lekach J, Enzel Y, Caffee M: Sediment yield exceeds sediment production in arid region drainage basins. Geology 2000, 28: 995–998. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<995:SYESPI>2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cockburn HAP, Seidl MA, Summerfield MA: Quantifying denudation rates on inselbergs in the central Namib Desert using in situ-produced cosmogenic 10 Be and 26 Al. Geology 1999, 27: 399–402. 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0399:QDROII>2.3.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukushimaken: Futaba fault survey, earthquake-related basic research grants FY 1998 report. Doc 1999, 3826: 109. Fukushima FukushimaGoogle Scholar
- Gosse JC, Phillips FM: Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application. Quat Sci Rev 2001, 20: 1475–1560. 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00171-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Granger DE, Riebe CS: Cosmogenic nuclides in weathering and erosion. In Surface and Ground Water, Weathering, Denudation and Soils, vol. 5. Treatise on Geochemistry (Holland HG, Turekian KK (exec eds). Edited by: Drever JI. Elsevier, London; 2007:1–43.Google Scholar
- Granger DE, Kirchner JW, Finkel R: Spatially averaged long-term erosion rates measured from in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides in alluvial sediment. J Geol 1996, 104: 249–257. 10.1086/629823View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hancock G, Kirwan M: Summit erosion rates deduced from 10 Be: implications for relief production in the Central Appalachians. Geology 2007, 35: 89–92. 10.1130/G23147A.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heimsath AM, Dietrich WE, Nishiizumi K, Finkel RC: Stochastic processes of soil production and transport: erosion rates, topographic variation and cosmogenic nuclides in the Oregon Coast Range. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 2001, 26: 531–552. 10.1002/esp.209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heimsath AM, Chappell J, Dietrich WE, Nishiizumi K, Finkel RC: Late quaternary erosion in southeastern Australia: a field example using cosmogenic nuclides. Quat Int 2001, 83–85: 169–185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heimsath AM, Chappell J, Finkel RC, Fifield K, Alimanovic A: Escarpment erosion and landscape evolution in southeastern Australia. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 2006, 398: 173–190.Google Scholar
- Heimsath AM, DiBiase RA, Whipple KX: Soil production limits and the transition to bedrock-dominated landscapes. Nat Geosci 2012, 5: 210–214. 10.1038/ngeo1380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hein AS, Hulton NRJ, Dunai TJ, Schnabel C, Kaplan MR, Naylor M, Xu S: Middle Pleistocene glaciation in Patagonia dated by cosmogenic-nuclide measurements on outwash gravels. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009, 286: 184–197. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heisinger B, Lal D, Jull AJT, Kubik P, Ivy-Ochs S, Neumaier S, Knie K, Lazarev V, Nolte E: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons 1. Fast muons. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2002, 200: 345–355. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00640-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heisinger B, Lal D, Jull AJT, Kubik P, Ivy-Ochs S, Knie K, Nolte E: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons: 2. Capture of negative muons. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2002, 200: 357–369. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00641-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Henck AC, Huntington KW, Stone JO, Montgomery DR, Hallet B: Spatial controls on erosion in the Three Rivers Region, southeastern Tibet and southwestern China. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2011, 303: 71–83. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.12.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hidy AJ, Pederson JL, Cragun WS, Gosse JC: Cosmogenic 10 Be exposure dating of Colorado river terraces at Lees Ferry, Arizona. Geol Soc Am Abstr 2005, 37–7: 296.Google Scholar
- Hidy AJ, Gosse JC, Pederson JL, Mattern JP, Finkel RC: A geologically constrained Monte Carlo approach to modeling exposure ages from profiles of cosmogenic nuclides: an example from Lees Ferry, Arizona. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2010, 11: Q0AA10. doi:10.1029/2010GC003084 doi:10.1029/2010GC003084Google Scholar
- Kohl CP, Nishiizumi K: Chemical isolation of quartz for measurement of in-situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1992, 56: 3583–3587. 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90401-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koike K: Geomorphological development of the northern part of the Abukuma Mountains. Komazawa Geography 1968, 4–5: 109–126.Google Scholar
- Lal D: Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: in situ nuclide production rates and denudation models. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1991, 104: 424–439. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90220-CView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsen IJ, Almond PC, Eger A, Stone JO, Montgomery DR, Malcom B: Rapid soil production and weathering in the Western Alps, New Zealand. Science 2014, 343: 637–640. 10.1126/science.1244908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto K, Yokoyama Y: Atmospheric Δ 14 C reduction in simulations of Atlantic overturning circulation shutdown. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2013, 27: 1–9. doi:10.1002/gbc.20035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsushi Y, Wakasa S, Matsuzaki H, Matsukura Y: Long-term denudation rates of actively uplifting hillcrests in the Boso Peninsula, Japan, estimated from depth profiling of in situ-produced cosmogenic 10 Be and 26 Al. Geomorphology 2006, 82: 283–294. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.05.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer H, Hetzel R, Fügenschuh B, Strauss H: Determining the growth rate of topographic relief using in situ-produced 10 Be: a case study in the Black Forest, Germany. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2010, 290: 391–402. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moon S, Chamberlain CP, Blisniuk K, Levine N, Rood DH, Hilley GE: Climatic control of denudation in the deglaciated landscape of the Washington Cascades. Nat Geosci 2011, 4: 469–473. 10.1038/ngeo1159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niemi NA, Oskin ME, Burbank DW, Heimsath AM, Gabet EJ: Effects of bedrock landslides on cosmogenically determined erosion rates. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005, 237: 480–498. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishiizumi K: Preparation of 26 Al AMS standards. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2004, 223: 388–392.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishiizumi K, Lal D, Klein J, Middleton R, Arnold JR: Production of 10 Be and 26 Al by cosmic rays in terrestrial quartz in situ and implications for denudation rates. Nature 1986, 319: 134–136. 10.1038/319134a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishiizumi K, Imamura M, Caffee MW, Southon JR, Finkel RC, McAninch J: Absolute calibration of 10 Be AMS standards. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2007, 258: 403–413. 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Portenga EW, Bierman PR: Understanding Earth’s eroding surface with 10 Be. GSA Today 2011, 21: 4–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Portenga EW, Bierman PR, Rizzo DM, Rood DH: Low rates of bedrock outcrop erosion in the central Appalachian Mountains inferred from in situ 10 Be. Geol Soc Am Bull 2013, 125: 201–215. 10.1130/B30559.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riebe CS, Kirchner JW, Granger DE, Finkel RC: Erosional equilibrium and disequilibrium in the Sierra Nevada, inferred from cosmogenic 26 Al and 10 Be in alluvial sediment. Geology 2000, 28: 803–806. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<803:EEADIT>2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rixhon G, Braucher R, Bourles D, Siame L, Bovy B, Demoulin A: Quaternary river incision in NE Ardennes (Belgium) - insights from 10 Be/ 26 Al dating of river terraces. Quat Geochronol 2011, 6: 273–284. 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.11.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodés Á, Pallàs R, Braucher R, Moreno X, Masana E, Bourlés DL: Effect of density uncertainties in cosmogenic 10 Be depth-profiles: dating a cemented Pleistocene alluvial fan (Carboneras Fault, SE Iberia). Quat Geochronol 2011, 6: 186–194. 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.10.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schaller M, von Blanckenburg F, Hovius N, Kubik PW: Large-scale erosion rates from in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides in European river sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2001, 188: 441–458. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00320-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shimizu F, Oyagi N: Landslide map, vol 6. Technical Note No. 125, NIED, Tsukuba, Japan; 1988.Google Scholar
- Shiroya K, Yokoyama Y, Matsuzaki H: Quantitative determination of long-term erosion rates of weathered granitic soil surfaces in western Abukuma, Japan using cosmogenic 10 Be and 26 Al depth profile. Geochem J 2010, 44: E23-E27. 10.2343/geochemj.1.0110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shiroya K, Yokoyama Y, Obrochta SP, Harada N, Miyairi Y, Matsuzaki H: Melting history of the patagonian ice sheet during termination I inferred from marine sediments. Geochem J 2013, 47: 107–117. 10.2343/geochemj.2.0231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siame LL, Bellier O, Braucher R, Sebrier M, Cushing M, Bourles D, Hamelin B, Baroux E, de Voogd B, Raisbeck G, Yiou F: Local erosion rates versus active tectonics: cosmic ray exposure modelling in Provence (south-east France). Earth Planet Sci Lett 2004, 220: 345–364. 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00061-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siame LL, Angelier J, Chen RF, Godard V, Derrieux F, Bourles DL, Braucher R, Chang KJ, Chu HT, Lee JC: Erosion rates in an active orogen (NE-Taiwan): a confrontation of cosmogenic measurements with river suspended loads. Quat Geochronol 2011, 6: 246–260. 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.11.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stone JO: Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production. J Geophys Res 2000, 105: 23753–23759. 10.1029/2000JB900181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Blanckenburg F: The control mechanisms of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005, 237: 462–479. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wittmann H, von Blanckenburg F, Maurice L, Guyot JL, Kubik PW: Recycling of Amazon floodplain sediment quantified by cosmogenic 26 Al and 10 Be. Geology 2011, 39: 467–470. 10.1130/G31829.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto T: The rate of fluvial incision during the Late Quaternary period in the Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan, deduced from tephrochronology. Isl Arc 2005, 14: 199–212. 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2005.00464.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama Y, Esat TM: Global climate and sea level: enduring variability and rapid fluctuations over the past 150,000 years. Oceanography 2011, 24: 54–69. 10.5670/oceanog.2011.27View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama Y, Aze T, Murasawa H, Matsuzaki H: Terrestrial Cosmogenic Nuclides as a tool for studying earth surface processes. J Geol Soc Jpn 2005, 111: 693–700. 10.5575/geosoc.111.693View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.